Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38524912›Full record

ArticleF&S reviews2024

A Systematic Review of Epigenetics of Endometriosis.

Bronwyn S Bedrick, Laura Courtright, Jiahui Zhang, Morgan Snow, Isabela Landsteiner Sampaio Amendola, Elisabeth Nylander, Kamaria Cayton-Vaught, James Segars, Bhuchitra Singh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F&S reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bronwyn S BedrickDepartment of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Laura CourtrightDivision of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jiahui ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA.
Morgan SnowJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Isabela Landsteiner Sampaio AmendolaDivision of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Elisabeth NylanderInformationist Services, Welch Medical Library, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kamaria Cayton-VaughtDivision of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
James SegarsDivision of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Bhuchitra SinghDivision of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Vermont Medical Center · US

Funding

Role of cancer-associated mutations in endometriosisR01HD096147 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SEGARS, JAMES H., SHIH, IE-MING · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
Johns Hopkins Women's Reproductive Health Research Career Development ProgramK12HD103036 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SATIN, ANDREW J. · 2020 to 2024
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD103036NICHD NIH HHS L50 HD110023NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD096147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the current literature evaluating the epigenetics of endometriosis in humans. Evidence Review: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines within PubMed, EBSCOhost, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. A comprehensive search strategy was developed by a data informationist. Observational and interventional studies assessing epigenetics in humans published in English up to January 15th, 2023, were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies evaluating the role of epigenetics in endometriosis. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Extracted data were analyzed descriptively. Results: We identified 18.639 studies, of which 57 were included, comprising 1.623 patients with endometriosis and 1.243 controls. Among the 57 studies included, 50 (88%) were case-control studies, and 7 (12%) were cross-sectional. Fifty-nine percent of the studies were Asian, 25% were from America, 14% were European, and 2% were from Africa. Acetylation and methylation were the two main key histone modifications that were centered in this review. Accordingly, we classified the studies as those focusing on genome-wide methylation and those on histone acetylation. Several studies identified an association between endometriosis and hypermethylated genes, including the PGR-B, SF-1, and RASSF1A. The genes HOXA10, COX-2, IL-12B, and GATA6 were found to be hypomethylated in endometriotic tissue by several studies. In regards to histone modification, multiple studies reported that the acetylation levels of histones H3 and H4 affect multiple genes associated with endometriosis. In addition, HDAC2 was found to be elevated in endometriosis patients in two studies. Conclusion: Several studies reported a significant difference between specific genes' methylation levels in endometrial biopsies and normal tissue, which suggests that DNA methylation may play an important role in the modulation of the genotype in endometriotic tissue. Acetylation and methylation are the two key histone modifications leading to differential gene expression in endometriotic tissues. The alterations in gene expression reported by the 57 studies can have direct implications on cell cycle growth, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis and, therefore, might play a key role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. This review offers insight that histone modifications need further research to evaluate their role as potential biomarkers and treatment targets for endometriosis. Although several key similarities were reported, there were some disagreements among the results, which might be attributable to the heterogeneity between studies. Further research with a more robust standardization is needed to validate the epigenetic changes in endometriosis.

Indexed as

EndometriosisGene ExpressionGenetic ProfileGenome

Identifiers

PMID38524912
PMCPMC10956470
OpenAlexW4391474256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.