ArticleJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences2024
Survival outcomes correlate with the level of cell-free circulating DNA in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Article in Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review of Methods for Measuring Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Plasma of Healthy Individuals.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Circulating-free DNA: A promising tool for early detection of myocardial infarction.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025Review
- Battle of the Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation.Biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Myocardial infarction (MI) can lead to higher cellular damage, making cell-free DNA (cfDNA) a potential biomarker for assessing disease severity. The aim of this study is to evaluate survival predictions using cfDNA measurements and assess its correlation with MI. Materials and Methods: A direct fluorescence assay was employed to measure cfDNA content in the blood samples of participants. The inclusion criteria included patients who gave informed consent, suffering from ST-elevation myocardial infraction (STEMI) based on established diagnostic criteria (joint ESC/ACC guidelines), between the age of 18 and 80 years old, and had elevated troponin biomarker levels. The study included 150 patients diagnosed with STEMI and 50 healthy volunteers as controls. Serial monitoring of patients was conducted to track their postdisease status. The rate of change of cfDNA was calculated and daily measurements for 7 days were recorded. Results: Mean levels of cfDNA were found to be 5.93 times higher in patients with STEMI compared to healthy controls, providing clear evidence of a clinical correlation between cfDNA and STEMI. Patients were further categorized based on their survival status within a 90-day period. The study observed a strong predictive relationship between the rate of change of cfDNA during daily measurements and survival outcomes. To assess its predictive capability, a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed. The ROC analysis identified an optimal cutoff value of 2.50 for cfDNA, with a sensitivity of 81.5% and specificity of 74.0% in predicting disease outcomes. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a robust association between cfDNA and STEMI, indicating that cfDNA levels can be a valuable early prognostic factor for patients. Serial measurements of cfDNA during early disease onset hold promise as an effective approach for predicting survival outcomes in MI patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.