ArticleJournal of pain research2024
Thoracoscopic Intercostal Nerve Block with Cocktail Analgesics for Pain Control After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pain management after pediatric minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether using a cocktail of intercostal nerve blocks (TINB) during thoracoscopic surgery results in better clinical outcomes than patient-controlled analgesia (PCIA). Methods: Patients in two medical groups undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for pulmonary nodules in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were collected consecutively between March 2022 and December 2022. The groups were divided into two subgroups based on their analgesic program, which were TINB group and PCIA group. The primary outcome was the visual analogue scale (VAS) of the two groups at different stage after surgery and after discharge. Any analgesic related adverse events (ARAEs) were also recorded. Results: A total of 230 patients who underwent VATS were enrolled, in which 113 patients (49.1%) received a cocktail TINB after surgery, and 117 patients (50.9%) received a PCIA. After PSM, 62 patients in each group were selected. The difference of resting VAS (RVAS) and active VAS (AVAS) at different stage during hospitalization was only related to the change of period (p < 0.05, p < 0.05), and the two groups showed no significant differences in RVAS or AVAS during hospitalization (p = 0.271, p = 0.915). However, the rates of dizziness (4.84% vs 25.81%, p = 0.002), nausea and vomiting (0 vs 22.58%, p < 0.05), fatigue (14.52% vs 34.87%, p = 0.012), and insomnia (0 vs 58.06%, p < 0.05) in TINB group were lower than that in PCIA group. Besides, AVAS and RVAS at 7, 14, and 30 days after discharge in TINB group were both significantly lower than that in PCIA group (p < 0.05, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Cocktail TINB provided better analgesia after discharge and reduced the incidence of ARAEs in patients undergoing VATS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.