ArticleHeliyon2024
Influence of inner ear impedance on middle ear sound transfer functions.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Middle Ear Transfer Function for Sound Conduction Study of Middle Ear Implants: A New Method.Journal of otology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: For experimental studies on sound transfer in the middle ear, it may be advantageous to perform the measurements without the inner ear. In this case, it is important to know the influence of inner ear impedance on the middle ear transfer function (METF). Previous studies provide contradictory results in this regard. With the current study, we investigate the influence of inner ear impedance in more detail and find possible reasons for deviations in the previous studies. Methods: 11 fresh frozen temporal bones were prepared in our study. The factors related to inner ear impedance, including round window membrane stiffness, cochleostomy, cochlea fluid and cochlea destruction were involved in the experimental design. After measuring in the intact specimen as a reference (step 1), the round window membrane was punctured (step 2), then completely removed (step 3). The cochleostomy was performed (step 4) before the cochlear fluid was carefully suctioned through scala tympani (step 5) and scala vestibuli (step 6). Finally, cochlea was destroyed by drilling (step 7). Translational and rotational movement of the stapes footplate were measured and calculated at each step. The results of the steps were compared to quantify the effect of inner ear impedance changing related to the process of cochlear drainage. Results: As the inner ear impedance decreases from step 1 to 7, the amplitudes of the METF curves at each frequency gradually increase in general. From step 6 on, the measured METF are significantly different with respect to the intact group at high frequencies above 3 kHz. The differences are frequency dependent. However, the significant decrement of rotational motion appears at the frequencies above 4.5 kHz from the step 5. Conclusion: This study confirms the influence of inner ear impedance on METF only at higher frequencies (≥3 kHz). The rotational motions are more sensitive to the drainage of fluid at the higher frequency. Study results that found no influence of cochlea impedance may be due to incomplete drainage of the cochlea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.