Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38524559›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Association between epidural analgesia and postpartum psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis.

Solmaz Ghanbari-Homaie, Seyedeh-Pooneh Jenani, Leili Faraji-Gavgani, Pooya Hosenzadeh, Mansour Rezaei

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07473609 (Analysis of the Incidence and Risk Factors of Epidural Analgesia Failure During Labor), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07473609 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Analysis of the Incidence and Risk Factors of Epidural Analgesia Failure During Labor: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorNicolas BroglyRan2026 to 2027Enrolled500ConditionsFailed Epidural Analgesia, Post-partum RecoveryArmsNo Intervention: Observational Cohort
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Solmaz Ghanbari-HomaieDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Seyedeh-Pooneh JenaniAcademic Board Member, Department of Midwifery, Islamic Azad University of Medical Science, Marand, Tabriz, Iran.
Leili Faraji-GavganiResearch Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Pooya HosenzadehClinical Research Development Unit of Taleghani Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mansour RezaeiDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRIslamic Azad University of Marand · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Women during the postpartum period are at risk for psychiatric disorders such as postpartum depression (PPD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and anxiety. It is controversial whether labour epidural analgesia have a protective role on PPD, PTSD, and anxiety or not. This study is a meta-analysis of previously published observational studies to investigate the association between epidural analgesia and PPD, PTSD, and anxiety. Methods: We searched Cochran Library, PubMed, ProQuest, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE from inception until December 2022. The outcome measures were positive screen of PPD, PTSD, and anxiety among women who received labour epidural analgesia. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the observational studies. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software. The mean differences or odds ratios were pooled based on random effect. Results: We included 31 studies (12,064 women) in the review. The meta-analysis of PPD studies reported mean (standard deviation) showed no significant association between epidural analgesia and PPD (Mean Difference = 0.01; 95% Confidence Interval = -0.14 to 0.16; p-value = 0.88). The meta-analysis of PPD studies reported percentage showed no statistically significant difference in terms of the chance of depression between the exposed and non-exposed groups (Log Odds Ratio = -0.61; 95% CI = -1.48 to 0.26; p-value = 0.17). The meta-analysis of PPD studies reported OR showed indicate a lower chance of depression in the epidural group compared to the non-epidural group (Effect size = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.64 to 1.38; P-value = 0.00). In the case of PTSD, due to the heterogeneity of the tools and the methodology of the studies, it was impossible to reach a definitive conclusion and measure the studies in a meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of anxiety studies showed that no significant association between epidural analgesia and anxiety (MD = -1.36; 95% CI = -3.38 to 1.14; p-value = 0.29). Conclusion: Based on the meta-analysis of observational studies, epidural analgesia for labour pain relief has no protective effect on postpartum psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaAnxietyBirthMental healthPostpartum depressionPost-traumatic stress disorderSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38524559
PMCPMC10958359
OpenAlexW4392603121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.