Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38524553›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Early assessment of blood culture negativity as a potential support tool for antimicrobial stewardship.

Giulia Menchinelli, Alice Oliveti, Barbara Fiori, Tiziana D'Inzeo, Teresa Spanu, Rita Murri, Massimo Fantoni, Maurizio Sanguinetti, Brunella Posteraro, Giulia De Angelis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giulia MenchinelliDipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Alice OlivetiDipartimento di Scienze Biotecnologiche di Base, Cliniche Intensivologiche e Perioperatorie, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Barbara FioriDipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Tiziana D'InzeoDipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Teresa SpanuDipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Rita MurriDipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Massimo FantoniDipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Maurizio SanguinettiDipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Brunella PosteraroDipartimento di Scienze Biotecnologiche di Base, Cliniche Intensivologiche e Perioperatorie, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Giulia De AngelisDipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether 48-h negative blood culture (BC) bottles are still negative at the classic 120-h incubation endpoint and whether 48 h might be the time to make antimicrobial therapy decisions. Methods: Data from the first collected bottles from bloodstream infection (BSI) episodes of single patients were retrospectively analyzed. Probabilities of bottles being negative at the classic endpoint were calculated from 0 to 120 h of incubation. Results: Among BC-negative episodes (4018/4901 [82.0%]), most (2097/4018 (52.2%) occurred in medicine patients. At 48 h, probability was 100.0% (95% CI, 99.9-100.0) for all 4018 patients. Of these, 1244 (31.0%) patients remained on antibiotics until 120 h. Excluding 401 (32.2%) patients who received antibiotics for another (non-bloodstream) infection, 843 (67.8%) of 1244 patients could have merited early (48-h) discontinuation of antibiotics. Stopping treatment in these patients would have led to saving 5201 days of access (943 [18.1%] days), watch (3624 [69.7%] days), or reserve (634 [12.2%]) AWaRe groups' antibiotics, which correspond to 65.6% (5201/7928) of days of administered antibiotics in all 1244 patients. Conclusion: As an early indicator of BC negativity, the 48-h endpoint could reliably support antimicrobial stewardship, but the clinical judgment remains imperative especially when BSI is highly suspected.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial stewardshipBlood cultureBloodstream infectionIncubation time

Identifiers

PMID38524553
PMCPMC10958360
OpenAlexW4392820470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.