ArticleACS omega2024
Seq-RBPPred: Predicting RNA-Binding Proteins from Sequence.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transitioning from wet lab to artificial intelligence: a systematic review of AI predictors in CRISPR.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Intron retention in health and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Predicting protein-nucleic acid interactions via protein language models with biophysical and evolutionary priors.iScience · 2026Article
- Transcriptomics and AI-driven approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Dysregulated RNA-binding proteins and alternative splicing: Emerging roles in autism spectrum disorder.Molecules and cells · 2025Review
- Research on Plant RNA-Binding Protein Prediction Method Based on Improved Ensemble Learning.Biology · 2025Article
- Review
- DNA sequence analysis landscape: a comprehensive review of DNA sequence analysis task types, databases, datasets, word embedding methods, and language models.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) can interact with RNAs to regulate RNA translation, modification, splicing, and other important biological processes. The accurate identification of RBPs is of paramount importance for gaining insights into the intricate mechanisms underlying organismal life activities. Traditional experimental methods to predict RBPs require a lot of time and money, so it is important to develop computational methods to predict RBPs. However, the existing approaches for RBP prediction still require further improvement due to unidentified RBPs in many species. In this study, we present Seq-RBPPred (predicting RBPs from sequence), a novel method that utilizes a comprehensive feature representation encompassing both biophysical properties and hidden-state features derived from protein sequences. In the results, comprehensive performance evaluations of Seq-RBPPred its superiority compare with state-of-the-art methods, yielding impressive performance including 0.922 for overall accuracy, 0.926 for sensitivity, 0.903 for specificity, and Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.757 as ascertained from the evaluation of the testing set. The data and code of Seq-RBPPred are available at https://github.com/yaoyao-11/Seq-RBPPred.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.