ArticleACS omega2024
Evaluating the Effect of Claytone-EM on the Performance of Oil-Based Drilling Fluids.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced performance of oil-based drilling fluids under HPHT conditions using an organophilic phyllosilicate.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An Amide-Carboxylic Acid Compound as Gel Structure Breaker to Improve the Rheology of Oil-Based Drilling Fluids.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study provides a detailed characterization and evaluation of Claytone-EM as a rheological additive to enhance the performance of oil-based drilling fluids (OBDFs) under high-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT) conditions. It also offers a comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of Claytone-EM with an existing organoclay, analyzing their mineral and chemical compositions, morphologies, and particle sizes. A series of experiments are performed to evaluate Claytone-EM's influence on crucial drilling mud properties, such as mud density, electrical stability, sagging tendency, rheology, viscoelastic properties, and filtration properties, to formulate a stable and high-performing OBDF. Results indicated that Claytone-EM had no significant impact on mud density but remarkably enhanced emulsion stability. Claytone-EM effectively mitigated sagging issues under both static and dynamic conditions, leading to improvements in the plastic viscosity (PV), yield point (YP), apparent viscosity (AV), and YP/PV ratio. The PV, YP, AV, and YP/PV ratios were improved by 11, 85, 28, and 66% increments, respectively, compared with those of the drilling fluid formulated with MC-TONE. The addition of Claytone-EM resulted in enhancing gel strength and improving the filtration properties of the drilling fluid. The filtration volume was reduced by 2% from 5.0 to 4.9 cm
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.