Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38524483›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

PROTAC-Design-Evaluator (PRODE): An Advanced Method for In-Silico PROTAC Design.

Ben Geoffrey A S, Deepak Agrawal, Nagaraj M Kulkarni, Rajappan Vetrivel, Kishan Gurram

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Bellerophon: An Automated Tool for PROTAC Decomposition.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2026
    Article
  4. Molecular Glues Stabilize Water-Mediated Hydrogen Bonds in Ternary Complexes.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The Applications of Computational Tools in PROTAC Development.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ben Geoffrey A SSravathi AI Technology Pvt. Ltd., 63-B, Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560099, India.
Deepak AgrawalSravathi AI Technology Pvt. Ltd., 63-B, Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560099, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1722-0864
Nagaraj M KulkarniSravathi AI Technology Pvt. Ltd., 63-B, Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560099, India.
Rajappan VetrivelSravathi AI Technology Pvt. Ltd., 63-B, Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560099, India.
Kishan GurramSravathi AI Technology Pvt. Ltd., 63-B, Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560099, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PROTAC (proteolysis-targeting chimeras) is a rapidly evolving technology to target undruggable targets. The mechanism by which this happens is when a bifunctional molecule binds to a target protein and also brings an E3 ubiquitin ligase in proximity to trigger ubiquitination and degradation of the target protein. Yet, in-silico-driven approaches to design these heterobifunctional molecules that have the desired functional properties to induce proximity between the target protein and E3 ligase remain to be established. In this paper, we present a novel in-silico method for PROTAC design and to demonstrate the validity of our approach, we show that for a BRD4-VHL-PROTAC-mediated ternary complex known in the literature, we are able to reproduce the PROTAC binding mode, the structure of the ternary complex formed therein, and the free energy (Δ

Identifiers

PMID38524483
PMCPMC10955709
OpenAlexW4392473833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.