ArticleACS omega2024
Analysis and Prevention of Rock Burst Risk of Working Face under the Influence of Continuous Irregular Triangular Coal Pillar Stress Concentration Area.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Irregular coal pillars inevitably appear in the layout of the current long-wall mining method, which easily forms stress concentrations and becomes a heavy disaster area of rock burst. In order to solve the impact risk of irregular coal pillar working face, it is necessary to study the instability mechanism of the coal pillar and put forward effective prevention and control measures. Based on the research background of 14320 working face of the Dongtan Coal Mine in the Yanzhou mining area of China, this paper studies the prediction and prevention of rock bursts in this kind of coal pillar by means of theoretical calculation, numerical simulation, engineering analogy, and field monitoring. The results show that (1) the absolute stability of coal pillar is that the width of coal pillar B reaches twice the support pressure of 2L, and the possibility of instability from large to small is coal pillars 2, 5, 3, 1, and 4. (2) The ratio of coal pillar strength to its average load determines the stability coefficient of the coal pillar, and it is judged that coal pillars 1 and 4 are in a stable state, coal pillars 3 and 5 are in a limit equilibrium state, and coal pillar 2 is in an unstable state. The numerical simulation shows that the maximum stress value inside the coal pillar during the mining process is basically consistent with the theoretical calculation of the bearing strength of the coal pillar. (3) The new evaluation method is used to evaluate the rock burst risk degree of the working face roadway: 156.75 m is a strong rock burst risk zone, 728.18 m is a medium rock burst risk zone, and 176.88 m is a weak rock burst risk zone. (4) Regional prevention and local prevention measures are proposed for the risk of rock burst in the roadway, which reduces the stress concentration of the coal pillar. It is verified that the pressure relief effect is remarkable, and the safe mining of such an irregular coal pillar working face is completed, which provides a solution for studying and solving such rock burst risk.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.