ArticleMethodsX2024
Predictive modeling and web-based tool for cervical cancer risk assessment: A comparative study of machine learning models.
Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced cervical cancer diagnosis using a novel Bayesian fusion ensemble method with explainable AI.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for colposcopic and cytological image analysis in early cervical cancer detection.iScience · 2026Review
- A Novel Method for Predicting Oncogenic Types of Human Papillomavirus.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- AI-Driven predictive modeling of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia severity: a comprehensive analysis with clinical adoption frameworks.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Review
- Recent advances in applications of machine learning in cervical cancer research: a focus on prediction models.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2025Article
- A precise machine learning model: Detecting cervical cancer using feature selection and explainable AI.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Article
- Nationwide study on development and validation of a risk prediction model for CIN3+ and cervical cancer in Estonia.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Models and Applications for Early Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In today's digital era, the rapid growth of databases presents significant challenges in data management. In order to address this, we have developed and designed CHAMP (Cervical Health Assessment using machine learning for Prediction), which is a user interface tool that can effectively and efficiently handle cervical cancer databases to detect patterns for future prediction diagnosis. CHAMP employs various machine learning algorithms which include XGBoost, SVM, Naive Bayes, AdaBoost, Decision Tree, and K-Nearest Neighbors in order to predict cervical cancer accurately. Moreover, this tool also designates to evaluate and optimize processes, to retrieve the significantly augmented algorithm for predicting cervical cancer. Although, the developed user interface tool was implemented in Python 3.9.0 using Flask, which provides a personalized and intuitive platform for pattern detection. The current study approach contributes to the accurate prediction and early detection of cervical cancer by leveraging the power of machine learning algorithms and comprehensive validation tools, which aim to provide learned decision-making.•CHAMP is a user interface tool which is designed for the detection of patterns for future diagnosis and prognosis of cervical cancer.•Various machine learning algorithms are employed for accurate prediction.•This tool provides personalized and intuitive data analysis which enables informed decision-making in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.