Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38524307›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

High-throughput microcontact printing of proteins in microwell cell culture plates.

Daryan Chitsaz, Timothy E Kennedy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daryan ChitsazDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Canada.
Timothy E KennedyDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Canada.
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microcontact printing (MCP) is used to pattern a surface with a specific compound, allowing the spatially restricted response of cells to be assayed as they encounter a molecule of interest. MCP is a relatively low-cost and accessible technique that uses commercially available reagents and common cell culture equipment. However, it can be technically challenging, slow, and incompatible with microwell cell culture plates that are widely used for screening and other applications. Here, we describe a novel protocol using medical biopsy punches to transfer patterns into standard 96-well plates via polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) cutouts. We demonstrate that this method can be used to deposit patterns of poly-D-lysine (PDL) into the microwells of glass-bottom plates. As a proof-of-concept, we show that cultured rodent glial cells preferentially grow and extend processes on the pattern. This method will allow larger scale MCP experiments in which different patterns, proteins, or other factors can be assayed in parallel.•Biopsy punches enable both cutting out small circular stamps and plunging them into tissue culture microwells to transfer proteins.•Compared to standard MCP, this method offers a more rapid workflow to pattern proteins onto substrates, and allows use of microwell plates that permits larger-scale experiments.

Indexed as

Cell assayHigh-contentHigh-throughput microwell microcontact printingMicropatterning

Identifiers

PMID38524307
PMCPMC10957495
OpenAlexW4392697730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.