Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38524273›Full record

ReviewPreventive medicine reports2024

DNA methylation as a triage tool for cervical cancer screening - A meeting report.

F Ricardo Burdier, Dur-E-Nayab Waheed, Belinda Nedjai, Renske D M Steenbergen, Mario Poljak, Marc Baay, Alex Vorsters, Severien Van Keer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Preventive medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Human Papillomavirus: An Old New History.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Epigenetic Biomarkers for Cervical Cancer Progression: A Scoping Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

F Ricardo BurdierCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Dur-E-Nayab WaheedCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Belinda NedjaiCentre for Prevention, Diagnosis and Detection Cancer Prevention Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Renske D M SteenbergenAmsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mario PoljakInstitute of Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Marc BaayP95 Epidemiology & Pharmacovigilance, Leuven, Belgium.
Alex VorstersCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Severien Van KeerCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
University of Antwerp · BEQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Ljubljana · SIVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: DNA methylation is proposed as a novel biomarker able to monitor molecular events in human papillomavirus (HPV) infection pathophysiology, enabling the distinction between HPV-induced lesions with regression potential from those that may progress to HPV-related cancer. Methods: This meeting report summarises the presentations and expert discussions during the HPV Prevention and Control Board-focused topic technical meeting on DNA methylation validation in clinician-collected and self-collected samples, novel DNA methylation markers discovery, implementation in cervical cancer screening programs, and their potential in women living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Results: Data presented in the meeting showed that HPV-positive, baseline methylation-negative women have a lower cumulative cervical cancer incidence than baseline cytology-negative women, making DNA methylation an attractive triage strategy. However, additional standardised data in different settings (low- versus high-income settings), samples (clinician-collected and self-collected), study designs (prospective, modelling, impact) and populations (immunocompetent women, women living with HIV) are needed. Conclusion: Establishing international validation guidelines were identified as the way forward towards accurate validation and subsequent implementation in current screening programs.

Indexed as

Cervical cancer screeningHPV-related diseaseHuman papillomavirus infectionMethylationMolecular biomarkerPrognostic biomarkerSelf-samplingTriage

Identifiers

PMID38524273
PMCPMC10959704
OpenAlexW4392504077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.