Article3 Biotech2024
Comparative genome-wide analysis of novel
Article in 3 Biotech, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Degradation of Wheat Straw byMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Draft genome sequence data ofData in brief · 2026Article
- Comparative genomic analysis of hemicellulose-degrading potential in bacterial isolates from the anterior intestine of Eisenia andrei (Bouché, 1972).Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Genomic and bioreactor evaluation of newly isolated cellulase-producing bacteria.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Draft genome sequence data onData in brief · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work compares two bacterial isolates Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-024-03936-5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.