ArticleF&S reports2024
The first clinical validation of whole-genome screening on standard trophectoderm biopsies of preimplantation embryos.
Article in F&S reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- PEStimate: predicting offspring disease risk after polygenic embryo screening.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Precise exome analysis of blastocyst biopsy scale samples using primary template-directed amplification.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Application of microdeletion and microduplication screening in preimplantation genetic testing: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Article
- Advances in single-cell DNA sequencing enable insights into human somatic mosaicism.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025Review
- Article
- Reproductive Choices in Haemoglobinopathies: The Role of Preimplantation Genetic Testing.Genes · 2025Review
- Screening embryos for polygenic disease risk: a review of epidemiological, clinical, and ethical considerations.Human reproduction update · 2024Review
- Clinical-grade whole genome sequencing-based haplarithmisis enables all forms of preimplantation genetic testing.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To validate the performance of our laboratory-developed whole-genome screening assay within clinical preimplantation genetic testing environments. Design: Perform a laboratory-developed whole-genome assay on both cell lines and trophectoderm biopsies, subsequently employing the next-generation sequencing procedure to reach a sequencing depth of 30X. Adhere to the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision calculations by comparing samples with references. Our assay was then applied to cell lines and biopsies harboring known pathogenic variants, aiming to ascertain these changes solely from the next-generation sequencing data, independent of parental genome information. Settings: Clinical laboratory. Patients: Coriell cell lines and research embryos with known chromosomal or genetic variants. Research trophectoderm biopsies from a couple that are heterozygous carriers for distinct variants in the same autosomal recessive gene ( Intervention: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision were assessed by comparing the samples to their references. For samples with known variants, we calculated our sensitivity to detecting established variants. For the research embryos, noncarrier, carrier, and compound heterozygous states of inherited Results: Amplification of DNA from cell lines and embryos yielded success rates exceeding 99.9% and 98.2%, respectively, although maintaining an accuracy of >99.9% for aneuploidy assessment. The accuracy (99.99%), specificity (99.99%), sensitivity (98.0%), and precision (98.1%) of amplified genome in the bottle (reference NA12878) and embryo biopsies were comparable to results on genomic DNA, including mitochondrial heteroplasmy. Using our assay, we achieved >99.99% sensitivity when examining samples with known chromosomal and genetic variants. This encompassed pathogenic Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first clinical validation of whole-genome embryo screening. In this study, we demonstrated high accuracy for aneuploidy calls (>99.9%) and genetic variants (99.99%), even in the absence of parental genomes. This assay demonstrates advancements in genomic screening and an extended scope for testing capabilities in the realm of preimplantation genetic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.