Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38524212›Full record

ArticleF&S reports2024

The first clinical validation of whole-genome screening on standard trophectoderm biopsies of preimplantation embryos.

Yuntao Xia, Maria Katz, Dhruva Chandramohan, Elan Bechor, Benjamin Podgursky, Michael Hoxie, Qinnan Zhang, Willy Chertman, Jessica Kang, Edwina Blue and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F&S reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuntao XiaLaboratory Department, Orchid Health, Palo Alto, California.
Maria KatzLaboratory Department, Orchid Health, Palo Alto, California.
Dhruva ChandramohanLaboratory Department, Orchid Health, Palo Alto, California.
Elan BechorLaboratory Department, Orchid Health, Palo Alto, California.
Benjamin PodgurskyLaboratory Department, Orchid Health, Palo Alto, California.
Michael HoxieLaboratory Department, Orchid Health, Palo Alto, California.
Qinnan ZhangLaboratory Department, Orchid Health, Palo Alto, California.
Willy ChertmanLaboratory Department, Orchid Health, Palo Alto, California.
Jessica KangHRC Fertility-Encino, Encino, California.
Edwina BlueHRC Fertility-Encino, Encino, California.
Justin ChenHRC Fertility-Encino, Encino, California.
Justin SchleedeLaboratory Department, Orchid Health, Palo Alto, California.
Nathan R SlotnickLaboratory Department, Orchid Health, Palo Alto, California.
Xiaoli DuLaboratory Department, Orchid Health, Palo Alto, California.
Robert BoostanfarHRC Fertility-Encino, Encino, California.
Eric UrciaHRC Fertility-Encino, Encino, California.
Barry BehrDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology - Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Stanford University, Sunnyvale, California.
Jacques CohenA.R.T. Institute of Washington, Bethesda, Maryland.
Noor SiddiquiLaboratory Department, Orchid Health, Palo Alto, California.
Encino Hospital Medical Center · USOrchid Pharma (India) · INStanford University · USThe Wildlife Society · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To validate the performance of our laboratory-developed whole-genome screening assay within clinical preimplantation genetic testing environments. Design: Perform a laboratory-developed whole-genome assay on both cell lines and trophectoderm biopsies, subsequently employing the next-generation sequencing procedure to reach a sequencing depth of 30X. Adhere to the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision calculations by comparing samples with references. Our assay was then applied to cell lines and biopsies harboring known pathogenic variants, aiming to ascertain these changes solely from the next-generation sequencing data, independent of parental genome information. Settings: Clinical laboratory. Patients: Coriell cell lines and research embryos with known chromosomal or genetic variants. Research trophectoderm biopsies from a couple that are heterozygous carriers for distinct variants in the same autosomal recessive gene ( Intervention: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision were assessed by comparing the samples to their references. For samples with known variants, we calculated our sensitivity to detecting established variants. For the research embryos, noncarrier, carrier, and compound heterozygous states of inherited Results: Amplification of DNA from cell lines and embryos yielded success rates exceeding 99.9% and 98.2%, respectively, although maintaining an accuracy of >99.9% for aneuploidy assessment. The accuracy (99.99%), specificity (99.99%), sensitivity (98.0%), and precision (98.1%) of amplified genome in the bottle (reference NA12878) and embryo biopsies were comparable to results on genomic DNA, including mitochondrial heteroplasmy. Using our assay, we achieved >99.99% sensitivity when examining samples with known chromosomal and genetic variants. This encompassed pathogenic Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first clinical validation of whole-genome embryo screening. In this study, we demonstrated high accuracy for aneuploidy calls (>99.9%) and genetic variants (99.99%), even in the absence of parental genomes. This assay demonstrates advancements in genomic screening and an extended scope for testing capabilities in the realm of preimplantation genetic testing.

Indexed as

clinical validationin vitro fertilizationnext-generation sequencingPreimplantation genetic testingwhole-genome screening

Identifiers

PMID38524212
PMCPMC10958695
OpenAlexW4390747168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.