Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38524204›Full record

ArticleF&S reports2024

Does embryo biopsy, independent of vitrification, impact perinatal outcomes? An analysis of perinatal outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing biopsy in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles.

Kristin Van Heertum, Elizabeth A DeVilbiss, James Goldfarb, Sunni L Mumford, Rachel Weinerman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F&S reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin Van HeertumDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Beachwood, Ohio.
Elizabeth A DeVilbissDivision of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland.
James GoldfarbDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Beachwood, Ohio.
Sunni L MumfordEpidemiology Branch, Division of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland.
Rachel WeinermanDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Beachwood, Ohio.
University Hospitals of Cleveland · USEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare neonatal outcomes in pregnancies resulting from embryos that have undergone preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) biopsy compared with no biopsy in both fresh and frozen embryo transfers (ETs) and determine whether findings are mediated by multiple births. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Society of Assisted Reproductive Technologies-Clinical Outcomes Reporting System data, 2014-2015. Patients: Autologous in vitro fertilization treatment cycles using fresh or frozen blastocyst ET, with or without PGT biopsy. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Large for gestational age (LGA), small for gestational age, and preterm delivery. Secondary outcomes included high birthweight, low birthweight, and clinical pregnancy measures. Outcomes were evaluated using log-binomial regression models with repeated measures. Models were used to estimate the controlled direct effects of biopsy on birth outcomes that were not mediated by multiple gestations. Results: In fresh ET, biopsy was associated with an increase in LGA (relative risk [RR] 1.45, confidence interval [CI] 1.04-2.02) that persisted in the model mediated for multiple gestation (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01-1.83) but was not present in an analysis restricted to elective single ET (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91-1.09). In frozen ET, there were no differences in any of the primary outcomes after accounting for multiple gestations. Conclusions: In a large multicenter database, there were no differences in neonatal outcomes after PGT biopsy in frozen ET cycles, and an increase in LGA was noted in fresh transfers that persisted even after accounting for multiple gestations but was not present in analysis restricted to elective single ET.

Indexed as

fresh embryo transferfrozen embryo transferin vitro fertilizationperinatal outcomesPreimplantation genetic testing

Identifiers

PMID38524204
PMCPMC10958688
OpenAlexW4391290161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.