Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38524189›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2024

Reducing trainee mistakes. Better performance with changing to a high-fidelity simulation system?

Aino Ritva Weyers, Gabriel von Waldenfels, Pimrapat Gebert, Wolfgang Henrich, Larry Hinkson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aino Ritva WeyersDepartment of Obstetrics, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany (Ms Weyers and Drs von Waldenfels, Henrich, and Hinkson).
Gabriel von WaldenfelsDepartment of Obstetrics, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany (Ms Weyers and Drs von Waldenfels, Henrich, and Hinkson).
Pimrapat GebertInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (Dr Gebert).
Wolfgang HenrichDepartment of Obstetrics, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany (Ms Weyers and Drs von Waldenfels, Henrich, and Hinkson).
Larry HinksonDepartment of Obstetrics, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany (Ms Weyers and Drs von Waldenfels, Henrich, and Hinkson).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostpartum hemorrhage is a significant cause of both maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide and is increasing in incidence. This study aimed to assess improvement and identify shortcomings in trainee performance in different simulation systems in the management of postpartum hemorrhage.

objectiveTo perform a pilot study evaluating and comparing high- and low-fidelity simulation models, assessing improvement in repeated performance with high-fidelity mode and identifying mistakes made assessed using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills and thereby exploring what aspects of emergency management of postpartum hemorrhage should be prioritized in teaching settings and assessing what simulation setup is most effective in achieving competence. STUDY

designThis was a prospective randomized, single-blinded, single-institution trial in a population of 17 junior obstetrical trainees at the Charité University Hospital Obstetric Simulation Center in Berlin. Trainees were randomized into 2 groups, with either initial low-fidelity simulation or high-fidelity simulation, followed by repeated assessment of performance, using the high-fidelity model simulation system. Individual simulation sessions were video-recorded and transcribed, and the timing of interventions was documented. Strandardized Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills forms were used as a checklist for performance.

resultsThere was a statistically significant general improvement in performance (

conclusionThere was an improvement in the performance when trainees underwent a repeated cycle of simulation assessment changing from a low-fidelity system to a high-fidelity system. Simulation assessment can identify mistakes and learning gaps that are important for obstetrical trainees. This study found that trainees make the same mistakes, regardless of which simulation model was initially used.

Indexed as

effective learningemergency drilllearning formatObjective Structured Assessment of Technical Skillspostpartum hemorrhageproficiencyquality of caresimulation assessment scriptsimulation-based learning

Identifiers

PMID38524189
PMCPMC10958114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.