Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38524082›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

The Delicate Dance of Intraoperative Anesthesia: Addressing Patient and Anesthesiologist Concerns.

Zaid Al Modanat, Lou'i Al-Husinat, Bashar M Mistarihi, Mohammad Tashtoush, Jood Alsarabi, Rama Matalqah, Hassan Mistarihi, Mohammad Wasfi Amir, Nawal Debajah, Esra'a Rejoub and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Zaid Al ModanatDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, JOR.
Lou'i Al-HusinatDepartment of Clinical Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, JOR.
Bashar M MistarihiDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, JOR.
Mohammad TashtoushDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, JOR.
Jood AlsarabiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, JOR.
Rama MatalqahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, JOR.
Hassan MistarihiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, JOR.
Mohammad Wasfi AmirDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mutah University, Karak, JOR.
Nawal DebajahDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, JOR.
Esra'a RejoubDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, JOR.
Raneem BereshyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, JOR.
Mustafa TawahaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, JOR.
Rana TaljInternal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, New York, USA.
Giustino VarrassiPain Medicine, Paolo Procacci Foundation, Rome, ITA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background In the realm of surgical procedures, patients and anesthesiologists have distinct concerns that can have an impact on their relationship. Patients are often riddled with anxiety about the unknowns of anesthesia and the possible risks. Anesthesiologists, too, face their own set of concerns. Despite the importance of this interaction, there has been little research on the specific concerns of both parties. Our study aims to fill this gap by describing and comparing the concerns of patients and anesthesiologists in Jordan. Methodology This cross-sectional study evaluated anesthesia-related problems based on specific questionnaires. The responses to the questionnaires were on a voluntary basis. The consent of the participants was granted after the aims of the study were clarified. Data were collected and analyzed using SPSS version 28 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results A total of 155 Jordanian anesthesiologists and 1,858 participants from the population who had undergone anesthesia participated in the study. In general anesthesia, over 60% of the anesthesiologists were most worried about ventilation and intubation difficulties during anesthesia induction and death at the end of anesthesia. Regarding regional anesthesia, the primary concerns included toxicity from local anesthesia infiltration (64.5%) and total spinal anesthesia (49.0%). Patients were concerned about various anesthesia-related scenarios, with the highest worries about pain (3.41/4), a sharp drop in vital signs (3.40/4), and an irregular heartbeat (3.39/4). Female patients, those with lower incomes, and those with a bachelor's degree reported higher anesthesia concern levels. Additionally, anesthesiologists' mean concern score was significantly lower than that of patients. Conclusions Patients concentrated on pain, a drop in vital signs, and irregular heartbeats, whereas anesthesiologists were worried about ventilation, intubation, and hypoxia. Patients placed more emphasis on personal experiences and social factors than technical issues. Therefore, patient education about anesthesia and discussion about intra and postoperative expectations are imperative to improve the surgical experience and the relationship between patients and anesthesiologists.

Indexed as

anesthesiaconcernsdoctor-patient relationshippatient-physician relationshippsychology

Identifiers

PMID38524082
PMCPMC10960964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.