ArticleCureus2024
Neuroprotection by Cerebrolysin and Citicoline Through the Upregulation of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Expression in the Affected Neural Cells: A Preliminary Clue Obtained Through an In Vitro Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cerebrolysin Ameliorates Age-Induced Dendritic Spine Degeneration and Memory Decline in C57BL6 Mice.Neurochemical research · 2025Article
- Current State of the Neurotrophin-Based Pharmaceutics in the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Neuroinflammation.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Combined citicoline and Cerebrolysin for neuroprotection in traumatic brain injury: a retrospective cohort analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Current neuroprotective agents in stroke.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCiticoline and cerebrolysin are two unique yet contentious medications because of inconsistencies in efficacy as well as the mystery surrounding their mode of action. The current study aimed to re-validate the neuroprotective benefits of these medications and investigate the possible molecular mechanism.
methodsNeuro-2A cells were exposed to tert-butyl hydroperoxide, a consistent in vitro model of neuronal damage caused by oxidative stress. The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, acridine orange/ethidium bromide (AO-EtBr) staining, and phase-view examinations were utilized to evaluate cell survival and cytotoxicity. Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based gene expression studies were conducted. KEY FINDING: Observations revealed that these two medications had modest but considerable neuroprotective effects. While the majority of the genes' expressions remained unchanged, cerebrolysin upregulated Neuregulin 1, and both upregulated brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression.
conclusionThe findings of the current study may be the first to suggest that citicoline and cerebrolysin may increase host cells' defense mechanisms (secretion neurotrophic factors) rather than carrying nutrients for cell survival. Because of its simplicity, the current study can readily be repeated to learn more about these two disputed medications for treating ischemic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.