ArticleCureus2024
A Study of Clinical Profile and Treatment in Adult Hemophilia Patients with Special Reference to the Inhibitor Levels.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Hemophilia is an uncommon, X-linked recessive bleeding condition characterized by a lack of either factor VIII or factor IX. It is more prevalent in men. Due to the substantial impact inhibitor development has on patient prognosis, the primary treatment for hemophilia is the transfusion of recombinant factors. The aim of our study is to investigate 40 adult patients with hemophilia in terms of their clinical profile, clinically relevant risk factors for inhibitor development, therapy-related aspects such as treatment duration, factor requirements, transfusion frequency, presence of inhibitors, and complications. Methods This cross-sectional observational study involving 40 patients of hemophilia over 12 years of age was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Gujarat. Data on sociodemographic characteristics, presenting complaints, bleeding episodes, hemophilia type, and medical history were gathered over a one-year span. Patients were stratified into mild, moderate, and severe groups based on their respective levels of factor activity. Various parameters, including the frequency of factor therapy, percentage of factor concentrate, inhibitor presence, and disease and therapy-related complications, were analyzed. The distribution of patients across these parameters was calculated and illustrated using pie charts. Results Nineteen out of 40 patients were from 20 to 40 years of age. The majority of cases (n=24), however, had been diagnosed before the patients reached the age of 10. All patients were male, and half of the patients (n=20) suffered from mild disease. The most common site of bleeding was the knee joint, and 33 cases had one to 10 bleeding episodes per year. Thirty-two out of 40 patients needed less than 40 factor vial transfusions, whereas eight needed more than 40 factor vial transfusions. Two cases of severe disease were positive for inhibitors of factor VIII, whereas one patient was found to have a hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Conclusions Hemophilia, a rare bleeding disorder, has primarily been studied in pediatric populations. This study, however, shifts the focus toward adult individuals. Our cohort consisted exclusively of male patients, with the predominant group diagnosed with hemophilia A and falling within the age range of 20 to 40 years. Most patients had been diagnosed before 10 years of age. The primary complication observed was joint bleeding, with the knee joint being the most commonly affected site. Approximately two-thirds of cases had a history of minor trauma necessitating factor replacement, yet only 5% exhibited the presence of inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.