Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38523958›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Artificial Intelligence in Dermoscopy: Enhancing Diagnosis to Distinguish Benign and Malignant Skin Lesions.

Shreya Reddy, Avneet Shaheed, Rakesh Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shreya ReddyBiomedical Sciences, Creighton University, Omaha, USA.
Avneet ShaheedPathology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
Rakesh PatelInternal Medicine, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents an innovative application of artificial intelligence (AI) in distinguishing dermoscopy images depicting individuals with benign and malignant skin lesions. Leveraging the collaborative capabilities of Google's platform, the developed model exhibits remarkable efficiency in achieving accurate diagnoses. The model underwent training for a mere one hour and 33 minutes, utilizing Google's servers to render the process both cost-free and carbon-neutral. Utilizing a dataset representative of both benign and malignant cases, the AI model demonstrated commendable performance metrics. Notably, the model achieved an overall accuracy, precision, recall (sensitivity), specificity, and F1 score of 92%. These metrics underscore the model's proficiency in distinguishing between benign and malignant skin lesions. The use of Google's Collaboration platform not only expedited the training process but also exemplified a cost-effective and environmentally sustainable approach. While these findings highlight the potential of AI in dermatopathology, it is crucial to recognize the inherent limitations, including dataset representativity and variations in real-world clinical scenarios. This study contributes to the evolving landscape of AI applications in dermatologic diagnostics, showcasing a promising tool for accurate lesion classification. Further research and validation studies are recommended to enhance the model's robustness and facilitate its integration into clinical practice.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (ai)benign lesionsdermoscopy image analysismalignant lesionsskin lesions

Identifiers

PMID38523958
PMCPMC10959827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.