ArticleCureus2024
Artificial Intelligence in Dermoscopy: Enhancing Diagnosis to Distinguish Benign and Malignant Skin Lesions.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Current State and Future Prospects for Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology.Dermatologic clinics · 2025Review
- Current Trends and Future Directions of Digital Pathology and Artificial Intelligence in Dermatopathology: A Scientometric-Based Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Mini review on skin biopsy: traditional and modern techniques.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Distinction of Actinic Keratosis and Seborrheic Keratosis.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents an innovative application of artificial intelligence (AI) in distinguishing dermoscopy images depicting individuals with benign and malignant skin lesions. Leveraging the collaborative capabilities of Google's platform, the developed model exhibits remarkable efficiency in achieving accurate diagnoses. The model underwent training for a mere one hour and 33 minutes, utilizing Google's servers to render the process both cost-free and carbon-neutral. Utilizing a dataset representative of both benign and malignant cases, the AI model demonstrated commendable performance metrics. Notably, the model achieved an overall accuracy, precision, recall (sensitivity), specificity, and F1 score of 92%. These metrics underscore the model's proficiency in distinguishing between benign and malignant skin lesions. The use of Google's Collaboration platform not only expedited the training process but also exemplified a cost-effective and environmentally sustainable approach. While these findings highlight the potential of AI in dermatopathology, it is crucial to recognize the inherent limitations, including dataset representativity and variations in real-world clinical scenarios. This study contributes to the evolving landscape of AI applications in dermatologic diagnostics, showcasing a promising tool for accurate lesion classification. Further research and validation studies are recommended to enhance the model's robustness and facilitate its integration into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.