ReviewCureus2024
Comparison of Cardiovascular Outcomes and All-Cause Mortality Between Patients With and Without Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular morbidity following epilepsy: A nationwide retrospective cohort study in South Korea.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Areas of research priorities in epilepsy: A position paper of the European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies, EpiCARE.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Sleep and Stroke-An Overlooked Bidirectional Influence: Why Should Sleep and Vascular Neurologists Work Closer?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Long-term phenobarbital treatment is effective in working-age patients with epilepsy in rural Northeast China: a 10-year follow-up study.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This meta-analysis aimed to assess the all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes among patients diagnosed with epilepsy. The entire process of this systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure transparency and reporting completeness. A comprehensive search strategy was employed to identify relevant studies in electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), from January 1, 2010, to January 15, 2024. Outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and arrhythmias. A total of 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis with a pooled sample size of 7,026,313. The majority of included studies were conducted in Taiwan (n=4). Our study revealed that individuals with epilepsy faced a higher risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and stroke. Although there was a higher incidence of myocardial infarction and arrhythmias among epilepsy patients, this disparity did not reach statistical significance. There is a need for future research to explore the impact of epilepsy types, antiepileptic drugs, and lifestyle factors on cardiovascular outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.