ArticleCureus2024
Feasibility of a "No-Biopsy" Approach for the Diagnosis of Celiac Disease in Symptomatic Adults.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- European Society for the Study of Coeliac Disease 2025 Updated Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Coeliac Disease in Adults. Part 1: Diagnostic Approach.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Guideline
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Celiac disease (CD) is an immune-mediated enteropathy, caused by hypersensitivity to gluten in genetically predisposed individuals. The worldwide prevalence of CD has been estimated to be approximately 1%. Most guidelines for diagnosis of CD rely on a sequential approach, with serological testing of antibodies against tissue transglutaminase (tTG) as a first-line test, followed by a duodenal biopsy. However, GI biopsy is an invasive procedure with various complications. Hence, this study was planned to ascertain whether it could be possible to have a non-biopsy approach, using only serological markers to establish the diagnosis of CD in adults. MATERIAL AND
methodsIt was a retrospective analysis of medical records of all biopsy-diagnosed CD patients with available anti-tTGA antibodies reports from 2019 to 2023. The patients were divided into three groups based on Marsh grading and anti-tTGA antibody levels were compared using various statistical tests.
resultsA total of 94 biopsy-diagnosed symptomatic CD patients with anti-tTGA antibody reports available formed the study group. Of these, 54 had biopsy findings consistent with Marsh 3 lesion, three had Marsh 2 lesion, and 37 had Marsh 1 lesion. A significant correlation existed between Marsh grading 3 lesion and anti-tTGA antibody levels above the upper limit of normal (ULN) x 10.
conclusionSerum levels of anti-tTGA antibodies greater than 10 x ULN can be used to identify symptomatic patients with Marsh grade 3 CD lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.