Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38523903›Full record

ArticleProstate international2024

Prognosis after radical prostatectomy in men older than 75 years: long-term results from a single tertiary center.

Jaewon Lee, Jungkeun Song, Gyoohwan Jung, Sang Hun Song, Sung Kyu Hong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A pharmacoinformatic approach for studyingFrontiers in oncology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jaewon LeeDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Jungkeun SongDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Gyoohwan JungDepartment of Urology, Hanyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Sang Hun SongDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Sung Kyu HongDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRHanyang University Seoul Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite longer lifespans, guidelines for prostate cancer treatment recommend surgery for those with over 10 years of life expectancy, potentially leaving older patients undertreated. This study examines the outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) in a large cohort of men older than 75 years. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 636 patients from a pool of 4,500 RP cases at a single tertiary institution from 2004 to 2022. Patients younger than 75 years or with incomplete records were excluded. Baseline clinical variables, including PSA and biopsy grade group (GG), as well as postoperative pathology and oncological outcomes, were assessed. Achievement of continence based on no pads and ≤1 pad at last follow-up were evaluated. Results: Mean age and PSA were 76.4 years and 15.3 ng/ml, respectively. At biopsy, GG1 and 2 were found in 18.1% and 31.5%, respectively, with 28.5% harboring GG4-5 tumors. After RP, 41.5% had GG upgrade compared to biopsy results, with 46.5% with ≥pT3 tumors. In a mean follow-up of 41.5 months, 82.3% were able to attain total continence of 0 pads, and 89.5% used ≤1 pads at the last follow-up. Overall and cancer-specific mortality was observed in 4.3% and 0.9%, respectively, and biochemical recurrence (BCR) occurred in 20.3% after a median of 154 months. At multivariate analysis, age was not a significant factor for BCR, whereas preoperative PSA, biopsy GG, margin positivity, and lymph node invasion were significant. Conclusion: RP is feasible in men older than 75 years with decent oncological outcome, with absolute age insignificant within this age group. Risk of undertreatment should be acknowledged, and definite treatment must be considered.

Indexed as

Prostate cancerRadical prostatectomySurvival outcome

Identifiers

PMID38523903
PMCPMC10960082
OpenAlexW4387079465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.