Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38523782›Full record

ArticleiScience2024

Mathematical model calibrated to

Daniel Rüdiger, Julita Piasecka, Jan Küchler, Carolina Pontes, Tanja Laske, Sascha Y Kupke, Udo Reichl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel RüdigerDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, 39106 Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.
Julita PiaseckaDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, 39106 Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.
Jan KüchlerDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, 39106 Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.
Carolina PontesDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, 39106 Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.
Tanja LaskeDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, 39106 Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.
Sascha Y KupkeDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, 39106 Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.
Udo ReichlDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, 39106 Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defective interfering particles (DIPs) are regarded as potent broad-spectrum antivirals. We developed a mathematical model that describes intracellular co-infection dynamics of influenza standard virus (STV) and "OP7", a new type of influenza DIP discovered recently. Based on experimental data from

Indexed as

Biological sciencesBiological sciences research methodologiesNatural sciences

Identifiers

PMID38523782
PMCPMC10959662
OpenAlexW4392467814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.