Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38523648›Full record

ArticleNanotechnology, science and applications2024

Evaluation of the Antimicrobial, Cytotoxic, and Physical Properties of Selected Nano-Complexes in Bovine Udder Inflammatory Pathogen Control.

Mateusz Wierzbicki, Magdalena Kot, Agata Lange, Aleksandra Kalińska, Marcin Gołębiewski, Sławomir Jaworski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanotechnology, science and applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mateusz WierzbickiDepartment of Nanobiotechnology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, 02-786, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3623-8929
Magdalena KotAnimal Breeding Department, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, 02-786, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2002-163X
Agata LangeDepartment of Nanobiotechnology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, 02-786, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1523-083X
Aleksandra KalińskaAnimal Breeding Department, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, 02-786, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5861-0635
Marcin GołębiewskiAnimal Breeding Department, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, 02-786, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0645-433X
Sławomir JaworskiDepartment of Nanobiotechnology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, 02-786, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4619-941X
Warsaw University of Life Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Patients and Methods: In this study, the effects of Ag, Au, Cu, Fe, and Pt nanoparticles and their complexes were evaluated in relation to the survival of bacteria and fungi isolated from cattle diagnosed with Results: With the exception of Fe and Pt, all exhibited biocidal properties against isolates, while the AgCu complex had the best effect. In addition, nanoparticles showed synergistic effects, while the low concentrations had no toxic effect on BME-UV1 and HMEC cells. Conclusion: Synergistic effects of nanoparticles and no toxicity to bovine and human cells might, in the future, be an effective alternative in the fight against microorganisms responsible for

Indexed as

bacteriacattlefungimastitisnanocomposites

Identifiers

PMID38523648
PMCPMC10961027
OpenAlexW4393010736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.