Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38523618›Full record

ArticleIntelligence-based medicine2023

Automatic generation of operation notes in endoscopic pituitary surgery videos using workflow recognition.

Adrito Das, Danyal Z Khan, John G Hanrahan, Hani J Marcus, Danail Stoyanov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intelligence-based medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Action classification for endoscopic pituitary adenoma resection: a consensus-based study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adrito DasWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom.
Danyal Z KhanWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom.
John G HanrahanWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom.
Hani J MarcusWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom.
Danail StoyanovWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Operation notes are a crucial component of patient care. However, writing them manually is prone to human error, particularly in high pressured clinical environments. Automatic generation of operation notes from video recordings can alleviate some of the administrative burdens, improve accuracy, and provide additional information. To achieve this for endoscopic pituitary surgery, 27-steps were identified via expert consensus. Then, for the 97-videos recorded for this study, a timestamp of each step was annotated by an expert surgeon. To automatically determine whether a step is present in a video, a three-stage architecture was created. Firstly, for each step, a convolution neural network was used for binary image classification on each frame of a video. Secondly, for each step, the binary frame classifications were passed to a discriminator for binary video classification. Thirdly, for each video, the binary video classifications were passed to an accumulator for multi-label step classification. The architecture was trained on 77-videos, and tested on 20-videos, where a 0.80 weighted-

Indexed as

Computer visionImage recognitionOperation reportStep recognitionSurgical AIWorkflow analysis

Identifiers

PMID38523618
PMCPMC10958393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.