Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38523549›Full record

ArticleJournal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery2024

Imaging follow-up strategy after endovascular treatment of Intracranial aneurysms: A literature review and guideline recommendations.

Yong-Hwan Cho, Jaehyung Choi, Chae-Wook Huh, Chang Hyeun Kim, Chul Hoon Chang, Soon Chan Kwon, Young Woo Kim, Seung Hun Sheen, Sukh Que Park, Jun Kyeung Ko and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Literature review and DELPHI consensus on follow-up and retreatment of intracranial aneurysms with intrasaccular devices.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yong-Hwan ChoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Jaehyung ChoiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Chae-Wook HuhDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dong-Eui Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Chang Hyeun KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
Chul Hoon ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegue, Korea.
Soon Chan KwonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Korea.
Young Woo KimDepartment of Neurosurgery ,The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Korea.
Seung Hun SheenDepartment of Neurosurgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center of CHA University, Seongnam, Korea.
Sukh Que ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Jun Kyeung KoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Sung-Kon HaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Korea University Medical Center Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea.
Hae Woong JeongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Hyen Seung KangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Clinical Practice Guideline Committee of the Korean Neuroendovascular SocietyClinical Practice Guideline Committee of the Korean Neuroendovascular Society.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEndovascular coil embolization is the primary treatment modality for intracranial aneurysms. However, its long-term durability remains of concern, with a considerable proportion of cases requiring aneurysm reopening and retreatment. Therefore, establishing optimal follow-up imaging protocols is necessary to ensure a durable occlusion. This study aimed to develop guidelines for follow-up imaging strategies after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

methodsA committee comprising members of the Korean Neuroendovascular Society and other relevant societies was formed. A literature review and analyses of the major published guidelines were conducted to gather evidence. A panel of 40 experts convened to achieve a consensus on the recommendations using the modified Delphi method.

resultsThe panel members reached the following consensus: 1. Schedule the initial follow-up imaging within 3-6 months of treatment. 2. Noninvasive imaging modalities, such as three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or contrast-enhanced MRA, are alternatives to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) during the first follow-up. 3. Schedule mid-term follow-up imaging at 1, 2, 4, and 6 years after the initial treatment. 4. If noninvasive imaging reveals unstable changes in the treated aneurysms, DSA should be considered. 5. Consider late-term follow-up imaging every 3-5 years for lifelong monitoring of patients with unstable changes or at high risk of recurrence.

conclusionsThe guidelines aim to provide physicians with the information to make informed decisions and provide patients with high-quality care. However, owing to a lack of specific recommendations and scientific data, these guidelines are based on expert consensus and should be considered in conjunction with individual patient characteristics and circumstances.

Indexed as

ConsensusDelphi techniqueEndovascular procedureIntracranial aneurysm

Identifiers

PMID38523549
PMCPMC10995472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.