ArticleCurrent medicinal chemistry2025
Evaluation of Efficacy of Curcumin and Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester in Breast Cancer by Preclinical Studies.
Article in Current medicinal chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel factorial design implemented spectrofluorimetric determination of caffeic acid: individual and combined assays with curcumin.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Therapeutic potential of curcumin in regenerative dentistry.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe aim of this study was to evaluate the combined and comparative efficacy of Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) and curcumin in breast cancer.
backgroundCAPE and curcumin are a class of phenolics. While curcumin is obtained from turmeric, CAPE is found in
objectiveWe evaluated the potential of CAPE and curcumin in both
methodsHuman breast cancer cell lines, MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7, were exposed to CAPE and curcumin, followed by functional assays such as cell cytotoxicity, cell proliferation and colony formation, cell cycle, mitochondrial membrane potential, apoptosis, and monodansylcadaverine (MDC) staining for autophagy. Computational analyses and mouse models were also used.
resultsEmploying computational analyses, both agents were found to exhibit drug-like properties. Both molecules interacted with the key molecules of the NF-κB pathway. CAPE and curcumin inhibited cell proliferation, colony formation, and invasion, triggering apoptosis in breast cancer cells. CAPE was found to be more effective than curcumin. Two agents working together were more effective than each agent working alone. Both agents suppressed the expression of survivin, Bcl-xL and GLUT-1. The level of cleaved PARP was increased by both agents. Both phenolics observed an induction in ROS generation. Further, both molecules triggered a dissipation in mitochondrial membrane potential. In mice models implanted with Ehrlich-Lettre ascites carcinoma (EAC) cells, both drugs inhibited the growth of the tumour. The phenolics also modulated the metabolic parameters in tumour-bearing mice.
conclusionThe observations suggest that the combination of curcumin plus CAPE may be better in comparison to individual molecules. Other: The study opens a window for analysing the efficacy of the combination of CAPE and curcumin in animal studies. This will provide a basis for examining the combined efficacy of two agents in a clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.