Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38523307›Full record

ReviewClinical diabetes and endocrinology2024

Dermatological side effects of dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 inhibitors in diabetes management: a comprehensive review.

Shirin Zaresharifi, Mahtab Niroomand, Sarina Borran, Sahar Dadkhahfar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical diabetes and endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Real-World Data on Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions to Drugs.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Association ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Semaglutide - properties, action and chromatographic analysis.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shirin ZaresharifiSkin Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4002-6953
Mahtab NiroomandInternal Medicine Department, Endocrinology Division, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Sarina BorranMedical student at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sahar DadkhahfarSkin Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. sahar.dadkhahfar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4058-2562

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are a class of drugs that enhance the incretin-insulin pathway and offer effective glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, these drugs may be associated with various dermatological side effects, ranging from mild to severe. This review article summarizes the current literature on the dermatological side effects of DPP-4 inhibitors, including bullous pemphigoid, severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions, fixed drug eruptions, and other mucocutaneous reactions. The review also discusses the possible mechanisms, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of these side effects. This review aims to increase the awareness and vigilance of healthcare providers in recognizing and managing the dermatological side effects of DPP-4 inhibitors and to emphasize the need for further research and surveillance to optimize diabetes care and patient safety.

Identifiers

PMID38523307
PMCPMC10962164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.