Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38522419›Full record

ReviewNeonatology2024

European Training Requirements in Neonatology 2021: The ESPR, EAP, and UEMS Accredited European Syllabus for Neonatal Training.

Charles Christoph Roehr, Tomasz Szczapa, Tom Stiris, Adamos Hadjipanayis, Berthold Koletzko, Rob Ross-Russell, Petra Hüppi, Sven Wellmann, Maximo Vento, European Board of Neonatal & Child Health Research (EBNCHR) and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neonatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The path towards a separate residency in "Neonatal Critical Care Medicine" has been paved in Europe.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Charles Christoph RoehrEuropean Society for Paediatric Research, Satigny, Switzerland.
Tomasz SzczapaEuropean Board of Neonatal & Child Health Research, Satigny, Switzerland.
Tom StirisEuropean Academy of Paediatrics, Brussels, Belgium.
Adamos HadjipanayisEuropean Academy of Paediatrics, Brussels, Belgium.
Berthold KoletzkoEuropean Academy of Paediatrics, Brussels, Belgium.
Rob Ross-RussellEuropean Academy of Paediatrics, Brussels, Belgium.
Petra HüppiEuropean Society for Paediatric Research, Satigny, Switzerland.
Sven WellmannEuropean Society for Paediatric Research, Satigny, Switzerland.
Maximo VentoEuropean Board of Neonatal & Child Health Research, Satigny, Switzerland.
European Board of Neonatal & Child Health Research (EBNCHR)
European Society for Paediatric Research (ESPR)
European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP)
European Board of Paediatrics (EBP)/Union of European Medical Specialists (UEMS)
The European Academy of Gynaecological Surgery · BECambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBEuropean Society for Paediatric ResearchEuropean University Cyprus · CYHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe European Union stipulates transnational recognition of professional qualifications for several sectoral professions, including medical doctors. The Union of European Medical Specialists (UEMS), in its "Charter on Training of Medical Specialists," defines the principles for high-level medical training. These principles are manifested in the framework for European Training Requirements (ETR), ensuring medical training reflects modern medical practice and current scientific findings. In 1998, the European Society for Paediatric Research developed the first ETR for Neonatology. We present the ETR Neonatology in its third iteration (ETR III), ratified by the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP), and approved by UEMS in 2021.

methodsIn generating the ETR III, existing European policy documents on training requirements, including national syllabi and the European Standards of Care for Newborn Health were considered. To ensure the ETR III meets a pan-European standard of expertise in Neonatology, input from representatives from 27 European national paediatric/neonatal societies, and a European parent organisation, was sought.

resultsThe ETR III summarises the requirements of contemporary training programs in Neonatology and offers a system for accrediting trainers and training centres. We describe the content of the ETR III training syllabus and means of gaining and assessing competency as a medical care provider in Neonatology.

conclusionGraduates of courses following the ETR III Neonatology will obtain a certificate of satisfactory training completion which should be accepted by all European member states as a baseline qualification to practice as a specialist in neonatal medicine, enabling mutual recognition of status throughout Europe.

Indexed as

European UnionNeonatologyAccreditationClinical CompetenceCurriculumEuropeHumansInfant, NewbornSocieties, MedicalEducationEuropeanNeonatologyRequirementSpecialistSyllabusTraining

Identifiers

PMID38522419
PMCPMC11412480
OpenAlexW4393065416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.