Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38522147›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2024

Rural Friendship Bench: A qualitative study in Zaka district, Zimbabwe.

K Kidia, D Machando, V Dzoro, D Chibanda, M Abas, E Manda, A Mutengerere, T Nyandoro, M Chawarika, D Majichi and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

K KidiaKushinga, Harare, Zimbabwe; Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: kkidia@gmail.com.
D MachandoKushinga, Harare, Zimbabwe.
V DzoroKushinga, Harare, Zimbabwe.
D ChibandaFriendship Bench, Harare, Zimbabwe; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
M AbasKing's College London, London, UK.
E MandaFriendship Bench, Harare, Zimbabwe.
A MutengerereSolidarmed, Masvingo, Zimbabwe.
T NyandoroSolidarmed, Masvingo, Zimbabwe.
M ChawarikaSolidarmed, Masvingo, Zimbabwe.
D MajichiLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
J H van DijkSolidarmed, Masvingo, Zimbabwe.
H JackUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBBrigham and Women's Hospital · USKing's College London · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Practice facilitation and supervision to strengthen depression treatment in primary care in ZimbabweK23MH129420 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Helen Elizabeth Jack · 2022 to 2026
$922k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH129420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe piloted the Friendship Bench-an evidence-based, urban-area task sharing intervention for common mental disorders-in rural Zimbabwe. The intervention combines problem solving therapy with income generating activities. This study sought to understand the intervention's implementation in terms of acceptability, feasibility, and sustainability as well as local attitudes towards mental wellbeing in rural Zimbabwe.

methodsUsing four separate semi-structured interview guides, we conducted in-depth interviews (N = 32) with patients (n = 9), village health workers (n = 12), nurses (n = 6), and community leaders (n = 5). We analyzed our data using thematic analysis with a diverse coding team using an integrative deductive-inductive approach.

resultsFive themes emerged: 1) explanatory models for mental illness, 2) clinical workflow and emphasis on documentation, 3) positive feedback about the Friendship Bench, 4) accessibility, and 5) feasibility.

conclusionIn its current format, our intervention was acceptable but neither feasible nor sustainable. Sociocultural context is critical in the development of rural task sharing interventions for mental health. We thus recommend a robust pilot and adaptation phase when scaling task sharing interventions in rural sub-Saharan Africa to elevate community voices, leverage existing social structures, and embed interventions as deeply into communities as possible.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchRural PopulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedZimbabweImplementationMental healthProblem-solving therapyQualitativeRuralTask sharing

Identifiers

PMID38522147
PMCPMC11221631
OpenAlexW4392977302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.