ArticleBlood advances2024
Machine learning to optimize automated RH genotyping using whole-exome sequencing data.
Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Establishment of a Lifetime of Cohort of Adults Surviving Childhood Cancer
Sickle Cell Clinical Research and Intervention Program
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence in Patient Blood Management: A Systematic Review of Predictive, Diagnostic, and Decision Support Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in hematology: current trends and application areas.Annals of hematology · 2025Review
- AI Applications in Transfusion Medicine: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.Acta haematologica · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in transfusion medicine: a paradigm shift on the horizon.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangueArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
abstractRh phenotype matching reduces but does not eliminate alloimmunization in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) due to RH genetic diversity that is not distinguishable by serological typing. RH genotype matching can potentially mitigate Rh alloimmunization but comprehensive and accessible genotyping methods are needed. We developed RHtyper as an automated algorithm to predict RH genotypes using whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data with high accuracy. Here, we adapted RHtyper for whole-exome sequencing (WES) data, which are more affordable but challenged by uneven sequencing coverage and exacerbated sequencing read misalignment, resulting in uncertain predictions for (1) RHD zygosity and hybrid alleles, (2) RHCE∗C vs. RHCE∗c alleles, (3) RHD c.1136C>T zygosity, and (4) RHCE c.48G>C zygosity. We optimized RHtyper to accurately predict RHD and RHCE genotypes using WES data by leveraging machine learning models and improved the concordance of WES with WGS predictions from 90.8% to 97.2% for RHD and 96.3% to 98.2% for RHCE among 396 patients in the Sickle Cell Clinical Research and Intervention Program. In a second validation cohort of 3030 cancer survivors (15.2% Black or African Americans) from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study, the optimized RHtyper reached concordance rates between WES and WGS predications to 96.3% for RHD and 94.6% for RHCE. Machine learning improved the accuracy of RH predication using WES data. RHtyper has the potential, once implemented, to provide a precision medicine-based approach to facilitate RH genotype-matched transfusion and improve transfusion safety for patients with SCD. This study used data from clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02098863 and NCT00760656.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.