Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38522059›Full record

SynthesisInternational ophthalmology2024

Applications of topical immunomodulators enhance clinical signs of vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) and atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC): a meta-analysis.

Nir Erdinest, Dror Ben Ephraim Noyman, Naomi London, Itay Lavy, Nadav Levinger, David Landau, Abraham Solomon, Yair Morad, Shehzad A Naroo

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Nir ErdinestDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Dror Ben Ephraim NoymanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel. dror.ben.ephraim@gmail.com.
Naomi LondonPrivate Practice, Jerusalem, Israel.
Itay LavyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Nadav LevingerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
David LandauDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Abraham SolomonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Yair MoradDepartment of Ophthalmology, Asaf Harofeh Medical Center, Béer Yáakov, Israel.
Shehzad A NarooCollege of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · ILAssaf Harofeh Medical Center · ILAston University · GBJerusalem Institute for Israel Studies · ILRambam Health Care Campus · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis meta-analysis aimed to review the safety and efficacy of topical cyclosporine A (CsA) and topical tacrolimus in allergic eye disease.

methodsA systematic search identified thirteen studies and a total of 445 patients for inclusion, making this the largest meta-analysis published on the subject. The current review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).

resultsThirteen randomized control trials were included in the meta-analysis. Eleven studies used CsA as the treatment, and two used Tacrolimus. In total, 445 participants were included, of whom 76.6% were male. The mean age of participants across the included studies was 14 years. All studies reported clinical signs as evaluated by an examining clinician. Signs were usually assessed by anatomical region, with the most common regions being the conjunctiva and the cornea, and the most common signs assessed were hyperemia and papillae. Three studies accounted for more than 50% of the meta-analysis's weight. Effect size (d) ranged from - 2.37 to - 0.03, negative values favoring immunomodulators. Fixed Effect Meta-Analysis returned an SMD of - 0.81 (95% CI [- 0.98, - 0.65]). However, there was significant heterogeneity (I

conclusionsThis study affirms the current scientific community's stance that immunomodulators effectively treat clinical signs, including blepharitis, conjunctival hyperemia, edema, papillae, and corneal damage in severe ocular allergic disease.

Indexed as

Conjunctivitis, AllergicKeratoconjunctivitisOphthalmic SolutionsAdministration, TopicalCyclosporineHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunomodulating AgentsImmunosuppressive AgentsTacrolimusCyclosporineImmunologic FactorsImmunomodulating AgentsImmunosuppressive AgentsOphthalmic SolutionsTacrolimusAllergic eye diseaseAtopyImmunomodulatorsKeratoconjunctivitisVernal

Identifiers

PMID38522059
OpenAlexW4393130492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.