SynthesisBMC surgery2024
Anastomosis selection in liver transplantation for recipients with unusable recipient hepatic arteries: a bayesian network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe anastomosis of donor and recipient hepatic arteries is standard in liver transplantations. For transplant recipients with unusable hepatic arteries, appropriate artery selection should be conducted using evidence-based considerations; therefore, this network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to analyze the most suitable alternative recipient artery for anastomosis during liver transplantations.
methodsComprehensive searches of the Scopus, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases were conducted to analyze observational studies containing non-standard anastomoses in liver transplantations that used the splenic artery, aorta, celiac, or branches of the gastric artery. The outcome parameters included intraoperative components, complications, and survival data. This NMA used the BUGSnet package in R studio and the results were presented in a Forest plot, league table, and SUCRA plot.
resultsAmong the 13 studies included in this NMA, 5 arteries were used for the anastomoses. The splenic artery anastomosis showed a high risk of thrombosis and a low risk of stenosis (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.13-3.14) and biliary tract abnormalities (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.36-1.55). In addition, the graft survival (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.96-1.23) and overall survival (1-year survival OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.94-1.26; 5-year survival OR 1.95% CI 0.83-1.22) showed favorable results using this artery. Constraints to the use of the splenic artery were longer operation and cold ischemic times. However, the duration of hospital stay (MD 1.36, 95% CI -7.47 to 10.8) was shorter than that when the other arteries were used, and the need for blood transfusions was minimal (MD -1.74, 95% CI -10.2 to 6.7).
conclusionIn recipients with unusable hepatic arteries, the splenic artery of the patient should be the first consideration for anastomosis selection in liver transplantations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.