Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38521774›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Multi-omic integration of microbiome data for identifying disease-associated modules.

Efrat Muller, Itamar Shiryan, Elhanan Borenstein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2026
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Microbiome and chronic pelvic pain in women: a mini-review.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Gut microbiota in health and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Harnessing the microbiome for cancer therapy.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Efrat MullerBlavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0193-0686
Itamar ShiryanBlavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Elhanan BorensteinBlavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. elbo@tauex.tau.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3002-0945
Tel Aviv University · ILSanta Fe Institute · US

Funding

The Dog Aging Project: Genetic and Environmental Determinants of Healthy Aging in Companion Dogs Competitive RevisionU19AG057377 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PROMISLOW, DANIEL EDWARD · 2018 to 2023
$29.0M
Israel Science Foundation (ISF) 2435/19NIA NIH HHS U19 AG057377U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) U19AG057377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-omic studies of the human gut microbiome are crucial for understanding its role in disease across multiple functional layers. Nevertheless, integrating and analyzing such complex datasets poses significant challenges. Most notably, current analysis methods often yield extensive lists of disease-associated features (e.g., species, pathways, or metabolites), without capturing the multi-layered structure of the data. Here, we address this challenge by introducing "MintTea", an intermediate integration-based approach combining canonical correlation analysis extensions, consensus analysis, and an evaluation protocol. MintTea identifies "disease-associated multi-omic modules", comprising features from multiple omics that shift in concord and that collectively associate with the disease. Applied to diverse cohorts, MintTea captures modules with high predictive power, significant cross-omic correlations, and alignment with known microbiome-disease associations. For example, analyzing samples from a metabolic syndrome study, MintTea identifies a module with serum glutamate- and TCA cycle-related metabolites, along with bacterial species linked to insulin resistance. In another dataset, MintTea identifies a module associated with late-stage colorectal cancer, including Peptostreptococcus and Gemella species and fecal amino acids, in line with these species' metabolic activity and their coordinated gradual increase with cancer development. This work demonstrates the potential of advanced integration methods in generating systems-level, multifaceted hypotheses underlying microbiome-disease interactions.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaBacteriaHumansMultiomics

Identifiers

PMID38521774
PMCPMC10960825
OpenAlexW4393112007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.