Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38521542›Full record

SynthesisJNCI cancer spectrum2024

Pathological response in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Nathalie A Waser, Melanie Quintana, Bernd Schweikert, Jamie E Chaft, Lindsay Berry, Ahmed Adam, Lien Vo, John R Penrod, Joseph Fiore, Donald A Berry and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Neoadjuvant Osimertinib for ResectableJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nathalie A WaserInsights, Evidence and Value, ICON plc, Burlington, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6880-8597
Melanie QuintanaBerry Consultants LCC, Houston, TX, USA.
Bernd SchweikertInsights, Evidence and Value, ICON plc, Munich, Germany.
Jamie E ChaftDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Lindsay BerryBerry Consultants LCC, Houston, TX, USA.
Ahmed AdamInsights, Evidence and Value, ICON plc, Burlington, ON, Canada.
Lien VoHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
John R PenrodHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
Joseph FioreHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
Donald A BerryBerry Consultants LCC, Houston, TX, USA.
Sarah GoringInsights, Evidence and Value, ICON plc, Burlington, ON, Canada.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Bristol Myers SquibbNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurrogate endpoints for overall survival in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy are needed to provide earlier treatment outcome indicators and accelerate drug approval. This study's main objectives were to investigate the association among pathological complete response, major pathological response, event-free survival and overall survival and to determine whether treatment effects on pathological complete response and event-free survival correlate with treatment effects on overall survival.

methodsA comprehensive systematic literature review was conducted to identify neoadjuvant studies in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Analysis at the patient level using frequentist and Bayesian random effects (hazard ratio [HR] for overall survival or event-free survival by pathological complete response or major pathological response status, yes vs no) and at the trial level using weighted least squares regressions (hazard ratio for overall survival or event-free survival vs pathological complete response, by treatment arm) were performed.

resultsIn both meta-analyses, pathological complete response yielded favorable overall survival compared with no pathological complete response (frequentist, 20 studies and 6530 patients: HR = 0.49, 95% confidence interval = 0.42 to 0.57; Bayesian, 19 studies and 5988 patients: HR = 0.48, 95% probability interval = 0.43 to 0.55) and similarly for major pathological response (frequentist, 12 studies and 1193 patients: HR = 0.36, 95% confidence interval = 0.29 to 0.44; Bayesian, 11 studies and 1018 patients: HR = 0.33, 95% probability interval = 0.26 to 0.42). Across subgroups, estimates consistently showed better overall survival or event-free survival in pathological complete response or major pathological response compared with no pathological complete response or no major pathological response. Trial-level analyses showed a moderate to strong correlation between event-free survival and overall survival hazard ratios (R2 = 0.7159) but did not show a correlation between treatment effects on pathological complete response and overall survival or event-free survival.

conclusionThere was a strong and consistent association between pathological response and survival and a moderate to strong correlation between event-free survival and overall survival following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyProgression-Free SurvivalDisease-Free SurvivalHumansLeast-Squares AnalysisProportional Hazards ModelsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38521542
PMCPMC11101053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.