SynthesisJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024
Unmasking bias in artificial intelligence: a systematic review of bias detection and mitigation strategies in electronic health record-based models.
Synthesis in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Elusive B Cell Antigen in Multiple Sclerosis: Time to Rethink CNS B Cell Functions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Validity and accuracy of artificial intelligence-based dietary intake assessment methods: a systematic review.The British journal of nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- How much can we save by applying artificial intelligence in evidence synthesis? Results from a pragmatic review to quantify workload efficiencies and cost savings.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- A five-phase evaluation framework for diagnostic and predictive medical artificial intelligence.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- PREFER-IT: A transdisciplinary co-created framework to realise inclusive health AI.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Ethical Aspects of Artificial Intelligence in Precision Medicine for Obesity Management.JMA journal · 2026Review
- Accuracy of administrative data in ascertaining health conditions: a systematic review.JAMIA open · 2026Review
- Strategies for mitigating artificial intelligence bias in healthcare: a systematic review.JAMIA open · 2026Review
- Information Distortion in Electronic Health Records: A Concept Analysis.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Across the Drug Development Lifecycle.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in orthopaedics: Enhanced examinations, ambient intelligence and the future of clinical practice.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Review
- Mitigating Algorithmic Bias in Cancer Site Classification Models.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2026Article
- Evaluation and improvement of algorithmic fairness for COVID-19 severity classification using Explainable Artificial Intelligence-based bias mitigation.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Automating clinical phenotyping using natural language processing.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Digital Mental Health Through an Intersectional Lens: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for predicting and preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes addressing bias and clinical translation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Transparency of medical artificial intelligence systems.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026Article
- Beyond protected characteristics: rethinking AI fairness through the lens of structural and social determinants of health.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Article
- From microscopy to antimicrobial decisions: a clinically grounded roadmap for critical care infectious diseases.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Research on the construction of an AI diagnostic model for plus disease of retinopathy of prematurity based on cross-center fusion datasets.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesLeveraging artificial intelligence (AI) in conjunction with electronic health records (EHRs) holds transformative potential to improve healthcare. However, addressing bias in AI, which risks worsening healthcare disparities, cannot be overlooked. This study reviews methods to handle various biases in AI models developed using EHR data. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, analyzing articles from PubMed, Web of Science, and IEEE published between January 01, 2010 and December 17, 2023. The review identified key biases, outlined strategies for detecting and mitigating bias throughout the AI model development, and analyzed metrics for bias assessment.
resultsOf the 450 articles retrieved, 20 met our criteria, revealing 6 major bias types: algorithmic, confounding, implicit, measurement, selection, and temporal. The AI models were primarily developed for predictive tasks, yet none have been deployed in real-world healthcare settings. Five studies concentrated on the detection of implicit and algorithmic biases employing fairness metrics like statistical parity, equal opportunity, and predictive equity. Fifteen studies proposed strategies for mitigating biases, especially targeting implicit and selection biases. These strategies, evaluated through both performance and fairness metrics, predominantly involved data collection and preprocessing techniques like resampling and reweighting. DISCUSSION: This review highlights evolving strategies to mitigate bias in EHR-based AI models, emphasizing the urgent need for both standardized and detailed reporting of the methodologies and systematic real-world testing and evaluation. Such measures are essential for gauging models' practical impact and fostering ethical AI that ensures fairness and equity in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.