Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38520667›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology2025

Exploring patient reported quality of life in lung cancer patients: A qualitative study of patient-reported outcome measures.

Elena Jensen-Marini, Darshini Ayton, John Zalcberg, Robert G Stirling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elena Jensen-MariniDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Darshini AytonDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
John ZalcbergDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Robert G StirlingCentral Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9877-5450

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death globally and provides a major disease burden likely to substantially impact quality of life (QoL). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been identified as effective methods of evaluating patient QoL. Existing lung cancer-specific PROMs however have uncertain utility and minimal patient involvement in their design and development. This qualitative study aimed to evaluate the patient perspective of existing PROMs and to explore their appropriateness for population-based descriptions of lung cancer-related QoL.

methodsA descriptive qualitative study was conducted consisting of semi-structured interviews with 14 patients recruited from the Victorian Lung Cancer Registry and Alfred Hospital using purposive sampling. Interviews first explored the factors most important to lung cancer patients QoL, and second, patient's perspectives on the appropriateness of existing PROMs. Thematic analysis was used to develop themes, and content analysis was conducted to determine PROM acceptability.

resultsFive novel themes were identified by patients as being important impacts on QoL: Personal attitude toward the disease is important for coping; independence is valued; relationships with family and friends are important; relationships with treating team are meaningful; personal and public awareness of lung cancer is limited. These patient-identified impacts are poorly covered in existing lung cancer-specific PROMs. Patients welcomed and appreciated the opportunity to complete PROMs; however, they identified problems with existing PROMs relevance, tone, and formatting.

conclusionExisting lung cancer PROMs poorly reflect the five themes identified in this study as most important to lung cancer patients QoL. This study reaffirms the need to review existing PROMs to ensure utility and construct validity. Future PROM development must engage key patient-generated themes and evolve to reflect the changing management and therapeutic landscape.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchlung cancerpatient‐centered carepatient‐reported outcome measuresPROMQoLquality of life

Identifiers

PMID38520667
PMCPMC11880980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.