Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38520640›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2024

Intraoperative mapping and preservation of executive functions in awake craniotomy: a systematic review.

Rabeet Tariq, Hafiza Fatima Aziz, Shahier Paracha, Noman Ahmed, Muhammad Waqas Saeed Baqai, Saqib Kamran Bakhshi, Annabel McAtee, Timothy J Ainger, Farhan A Mirza, Syed Ather Enam

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Rabeet TariqSection of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Hafiza Fatima AzizSection of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Shahier ParachaSection of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Noman AhmedSection of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Waqas Saeed BaqaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southmead Hospital, NHS North Bristol Trust, Bristol, UK.
Saqib Kamran BakhshiSection of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Annabel McAteeCollege of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Timothy J AingerDepartment of Neurology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Kentucky Neuroscience Institute, Lexington, KY, USA.
Farhan A MirzaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kentucky Neuroscience Institute (KNI), University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Syed Ather EnamSection of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. ather.enam@aku.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2194-0723
Aga Khan University Hospital · PKUniversity of Kentucky · USAga Khan University Hospital Nairobi · KENorth Bristol NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Awake craniotomy (AC) allows intraoperative brain mapping (ioBM) for maximum lesion resection while monitoring and preserving neurological function. Conventionally, language, visuospatial assessment, and motor functions are mapped, while the assessment of executive functions (EF) is uncommon. Impaired EF may lead to occupational, personal, and social limitations, thus, a compromised quality of life. A comprehensive literature search was conducted through Scopus, Medline, and Cochrane Library using a pre-defined search strategy. Articles were selected after duplicate removal, initial screening, and full-text assessment. The demographic details, ioBM techniques, intraoperative tasks, and their assessments, the extent of resection (EOR), post-op EF and neurocognitive status, and feasibility and potential adverse effects of the procedure were reviewed. The correlations of tumor locations with intraoperative EF deficits were also assessed. A total of 13 studies with intraoperative EF assessment of 351 patients were reviewed. Awake-asleep-awake protocol was most commonly used. Most studies performed ioBM using bipolar stimulation, with a frequency of 60 Hz, pulse durations ranging 1-2 ms, and intensity ranging 2-6 mA. Cognitive function was monitored with the Stroop task, spatial-2-back test, line-bisection test, trail-making-task, and digit-span tests. All studies reported similar or better EOR in patients with ioBM for EF. When comparing the neuropsychological outcomes of patients with ioBM of EF to those without it, all studies reported significantly better EF preservation in ioBM groups. Most authors reported EF mapping as a feasible tool to obtain satisfactory outcomes. Adverse effects included intraoperative seizures which were easily controlled. AC with ioBM of EF is a safe, effective, and feasible technique that allows satisfactory EOR and improved neurocognitive outcomes with minimal adverse effects.

Indexed as

Brain MappingCraniotomyExecutive FunctionWakefulnessBrain NeoplasmsHumansIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringAwake craniotomyAwake surgeryBrain mappingCognitive functionsDirect electric stimulationExecutive functions

Identifiers

PMID38520640
OpenAlexW4393113929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.