Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38520520›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2024

Machine learning models help differentiate between causes of recurrent spontaneous vertigo.

Chao Wang, Allison S Young, Chahat Raj, Andrew P Bradshaw, Benjamin Nham, Sally M Rosengren, Zeljka Calic, David Burke, G Michael Halmagyi, Gnana K Bharathy and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chao WangInstitute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6500-5118
Allison S YoungCentral Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7497-6880
Chahat RajSchool of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0083-6812
Andrew P BradshawInstitute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Benjamin NhamInstitute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Sally M RosengrenInstitute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3830-7214
Zeljka CalicDepartment of Neurophysiology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0635-016X
David BurkeInstitute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
G Michael HalmagyiInstitute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9743-466X
Gnana K BharathySchool of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8384-9509
Mukesh PrasadSchool of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7745-9667
Miriam S WelgampolaInstitute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia. miriam@icn.usyd.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4573-4740
The University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AULiverpool Hospital · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

Garnett Passe and Rodney Williams Memorial Foundation 2021_RS_Wang
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVestibular migraine (VM) and Menière's disease (MD) are two common causes of recurrent spontaneous vertigo. Using history, video-nystagmography and audiovestibular tests, we developed machine learning models to separate these two disorders.

methodsWe recruited patients with VM or MD from a neurology outpatient facility. One hundred features from six "feature subsets": history, acute video-nystagmography and four laboratory tests (video head impulse test, vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials, caloric testing and audiogram) were used. We applied ten machine learning algorithms to develop classification models. Modelling was performed using three "tiers" of data availability to simulate three clinical settings. "Tier 1" used all available data to simulate the neuro-otology clinic, "Tier 2" used only history, audiogram and caloric test data, representing the general neurology clinic, and "Tier 3" used history alone as occurs in primary care. Model performance was evaluated using tenfold cross-validation.

resultsData from 160 patients with VM and 114 with MD were used for model development. All models effectively separated the two disorders for all three tiers, with accuracies of 85.77-97.81%. The best performing algorithms (AdaBoost and Random Forest) yielded accuracies of 97.81% (95% CI 95.24-99.60), 94.53% (91.09-99.52%) and 92.34% (92.28-96.76%) for tiers 1, 2 and 3. The best feature subset combination was history, acute video-nystagmography, video head impulse test and caloric testing, and the best single feature subset was history.

conclusionsMachine learning models can accurately differentiate between VM and MD and are promising tools to assist diagnosis by medical practitioners with diverse levels of expertise and resources.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMeniere DiseaseMigraine DisordersVertigoAdultAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceArtificial intelligenceMenière’s diseaseVestibular migraine

Identifiers

PMID38520520
OpenAlexW4393115904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.