Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38520376›Full record

Observational studyHuman brain mapping2024

Structural brain networks correlating with poststroke cognition.

Sonia L E Brownsett, Leeanne M Carey, David Copland, Alistair Walsh, Aleksi J Sihvonen

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sonia L E BrownsettCentre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1569-2014
Leeanne M CareyOccupational Therapy, School of Allied Health Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
David CoplandCentre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Alistair WalshOccupational Therapy, School of Allied Health Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Aleksi J SihvonenCentre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
La Trobe University · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

Commonwealth Science and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Flagship Collaborative FundMaire Taponen FoundationNational Health and Medical Research Council 1104194National Health and Medical Research Council 1113352National Health and Medical Research Council 2004443NHMRC-Funded Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation #1153236Orion Research Foundation srSigne and Ane Gyllenberg FoundationSuomen Kulttuurirahasto 191230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive deficits are a common and debilitating consequence of stroke, yet our understanding of the structural neurobiological biomarkers predicting recovery of cognition after stroke remains limited. In this longitudinal observational study, we set out to investigate the effect of both focal lesions and structural connectivity on poststroke cognition. Sixty-two patients with stroke underwent advanced brain imaging and cognitive assessment, utilizing the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), at 3-month and 12-month poststroke. We first evaluated the relationship between lesions and cognition at 3 months using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Next, a novel correlational tractography approach, using multi-shell diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data collected at both time points, was used to evaluate the relationship between the white matter connectome and cognition cross-sectionally at 3 months, and longitudinally (12 minus 3 months). Lesion-symptom mapping did not yield significant findings. In turn, correlational tractography analyses revealed positive associations between both MoCA and MMSE scores and bilateral cingulum and the corpus callosum, both cross-sectionally at the 3-month stage, and longitudinally. These results demonstrate that rather than focal neural structures, a consistent structural connectome underpins the performance of two frequently used cognitive screening tools, the MoCA and the MMSE, in people after stroke. This finding should encourage clinicians and researchers to not only suspect cognitive decline when lesions affect these tracts, but also to refine their investigation of novel approaches to differentially diagnosing pathology associated with cognitive decline, regardless of the aetiology.

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersCognitive DysfunctionStrokeBrainCognitionHumansNeuropsychological TestscognitionconnectometryMMSEMoCAstrokewhite matter

Identifiers

PMID38520376
PMCPMC10960554
OpenAlexW4393111973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.