Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38520125›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2024

Clinical Efficacy of Unilateral Dual-channel Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis with Spinal Scoliosis.

Xuanjun You, Bin Zhao, Tao Zhang, Yongfeng Wang, Chaojian Xu, Jie Yuan, Ruxing Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Distinguishing reactive scoliosis: clinical presentation, pathophysiology and a proposed clinical framework.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xuanjun YouDepartment of Orthopaedic, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5303-5509
Bin ZhaoDepartment of Orthopaedic, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5360-6725
Tao ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedic, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Yongfeng WangDepartment of Orthopaedic, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1943-3298
Chaojian XuDepartment of Orthopaedic, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4818-901X
Jie YuanDepartment of Orthopaedic, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Ruxing LiuDepartment of Orthopaedic, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Shanxi Medical University · CN

Funding

General Program of Natural Science Research of Shanxi Basic Research Program 202203021211040the Youth Science Research Program of Shanxi Basic Research Program 20210302124670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesScoliosis associated with spondylolisthesis is a common phenomenon. Recent research has reported that scoliosis can spontaneously disappear after lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Researchers have advocated that, for scoliosis associated with vertebral slippage, surgery for the latter may be the only necessary intervention, while unnecessary surgery for scoliosis should be avoided. So we propose that minimally invasive techniques can achieve treatment effects similar to those of open surgery. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of unilateral dual-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal scoliosis.

methodsThis study retrospectively analyzed patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis and spinal scoliosis who underwent ULIF between September 2021 and September 2023. Measurements of the Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis (LL) angle, sacral slope (SS), slip percentage (SP), slip angle (SA), L1 plumb line-S1 distance (LASD), and average intervertebral height (AIH) were taken preoperatively, immediately following surgery, 3 months after surgery, and at the final follow-up. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring systems were used to assess clinical results. The surgical efficacy was evaluated by comparing these parameters before and after surgery. Comparison of indicators within the same group was conducted using one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance or paired sample t-tests, whereas between-group differences were compared using an independent t-test.

resultsThis study included 31 individuals who underwent surgery and completed follow-up. The follow-up period did not show a significant loss of corrective angles. Furthermore, the Cobb angle, SP, SA, and LASD significantly decreased after surgery, whereas the LL angle, SS, and AIH significantly increased (all p < 0.05). SP did not differ between the immediate postoperative period and the 3-month and final follow-up periods (p > 0.05). However, other parameters significantly improved during the follow-up period at all time points, except from 3 months to the final follow-up period (p > 0.05). Throughout the follow-up period, the lower back and leg pain VAS, ODI, and JOA scores considerably improved compared with the preoperative levels (p < 0.05).

conclusionULIF effectively treated lumbar spondylolisthesis with scoliosis, thereby reducing the degree of slip and scoliosis. By performing surgical reduction, fusion, and fixation only on the slipped segment, ULIF also had a corrective effect on the spinal lateral curvature, thereby avoiding the need for unnecessary scoliosis surgery. Moreover, the short-term efficacy was satisfactory, but the long-term efficacy requires further study.

Indexed as

EndoscopyLumbar VertebraeScoliosisSpinal FusionSpondylolisthesisAdultAgedDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRetrospective StudiesEndoscopyLumbar vertebraeScoliosisSpondylolisthesisTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID38520125
PMCPMC11062877
OpenAlexW4393118240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.