ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024
ACR benchmark testing of a novel high-speed ring-gantry linac kV-CBCT system.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating Image Quality of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Using HyperSight® on the Varian TrueBeam.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Quantitative stability of CT numbers in novel cone-beam CT: An intra-institution cross-scanner and longitudinal analysis.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Dynamic modulated arc therapy (DMAT): A time-aware, modulation-steered optimization framework for next-generation radiotherapy delivery.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Development of CBCT-Guided Online Adaptive Radiotherapy.Cancers · 2026Review
- Quantitative assessment of CBCT image quality metrics and their translation to clinical Art workflow performance in breast cancer patients.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Refining imaging parameters for dual-energy cone-beam computed tomography in image-guided radiation therapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Structure visibility and online adaptation suitability of a new high-performance ring-gantry cone-beam computed tomography imaging system in thoracic radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Auto-segmentation and dose accuracy evaluation of synthetic computed tomography generated from pelvis cone-beam computed tomography images using a cycle-generative adversarial network with a novel loss function.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Multi-institutional validation of hypersight CBCT-based dose calculation on O-ring linacs.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Multispectral PCCT and CBCT imaging for high precision radiotherapy through translation of imaging parameters with machine learning validation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A clinical evaluation of HyperSight CBCT enhanced offline adaptive breast radiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Impact of tumor motion on target delineation and dose calculation accuracy using rapid-acquisition HyperSight CBCT in online adaptive radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Correlation between exposure (mAs) and image quality for a rapid cone-beam CT on a ring gantry linear accelerator.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Advanced HyperSight™ imaging for patients with adaptive SBRT of prostate cancer: a longitudinal analysis of tissue demarcation.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Localization accuracy of 6-second CBCT for lung IGRT with various breathing patterns.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Multi-institutional study on image quality for a novel CBCT solution on O-ring linac.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Article
- Dose calculation accuracy of clinical radiotherapy plans using next generation cone beam computed tomography imaging technology.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Online Radiotherapy: The Paradigm Shift to Real-Time Adaptive Radiotherapy.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Review
- Advancing the Collaboration Between Imaging and Radiation Oncology.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A new generation cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) system with new hardware design and advanced image reconstruction algorithms is available for radiation treatment simulation or adaptive radiotherapy (HyperSight CBCT imaging solution, Varian Medical Systems-a Siemens Healthineers company). This study assesses the CBCT image quality metrics using the criteria routinely used for diagnostic CT scanner accreditation as a first step towards the future use of HyperSight CBCT images for treatment planning and target/organ delineations. Image performance was evaluated using American College of Radiology (ACR) Program accreditation phantom tests for diagnostic computed tomography systems (CTs) and compared HyperSight images with a standard treatment planning diagnostic CT scanner (Siemens SOMATOM Edge) and with existing CBCT systems (Varian TrueBeam version 2.7 and Varian Halcyon version 2.0). Image quality performance for all Varian HyperSight CBCT vendor-provided imaging protocols were assessed using ACR head and body ring CT phantoms, then compared to existing imaging modalities. Image quality analysis metrics included contrast-to-noise (CNR), spatial resolution, Hounsfield number (HU) accuracy, image scaling, and uniformity. All image quality assessments were made following the recommendations and passing criteria provided by the ACR. The Varian HyperSight CBCT imaging system demonstrated excellent image quality, with the majority of vendor-provided imaging protocols capable of passing all ACR CT accreditation standards. Nearly all (8/11) vendor-provided protocols passed ACR criteria using the ACR head phantom, with the Abdomen Large, Pelvis Large, and H&N vendor-provided protocols produced HU uniformity values slightly exceeding passing criteria but remained within the allowable minor deviation levels (5-7 HU maximum differences). Compared to other existing CT and CBCT imaging modalities, both HyperSight Head and Pelvis imaging protocols matched the performance of the SOMATOM CT scanner, and both the HyperSight and SOMATOM CT substantially surpassed the performance of the Halcyon 2.0 and TrueBeam version 2.7 systems. Varian HyperSight CBCT imaging system could pass almost all tests for all vendor-provided protocols using ACR accreditation criteria, with image quality similar to those produced by diagnostic CT scanners and significantly better than existing linac-based CBCT imaging systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.