Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38520045›Full record

Trial reportJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2024

Effects of discontinuation of serotonergic antidepressants prior to psilocybin therapy versus escitalopram for major depression.

David Erritzoe, Tommaso Barba, Meg J Spriggs, Fernando E Rosas, David J Nutt, Robin Carhart-Harris

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Concomitant use of antidepressants and classic psychedelics: A scoping review.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  11. The psychedelic-peptide paradox: a hormetic hypothesis.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2025
    Review
  12. The Emergence of Psilocybin in Psychiatry and Neuroscience.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David ErritzoeDivision of Psychiatry, Department Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7022-6211
Tommaso BarbaDivision of Psychiatry, Department Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2565-4628
Meg J SpriggsDivision of Psychiatry, Department Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Fernando E RosasDivision of Psychiatry, Department Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, UK.
David J NuttDivision of Psychiatry, Department Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Robin Carhart-HarrisDivision of Psychiatry, Department Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6062-7150
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is growing evidence for the therapeutic effects of the psychedelic drug psilocybin for major depression. However, due to the lack of safety data on combining psilocybin with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) and concerns that there may be a negative interaction on efficacy, participants enrolling in psychedelic trials are usually required to discontinue SNRI/SNRIs prior to enrolling.

aimsUsing data from a recent clinical trial examining the comparative efficacy the psychedelic drug psilocybin (P) combined with approximately 20 h of psychological support to a 6-week (daily) course of the SSRI escitalopram plus matched psychological support for major depressive disorder, we explored the effects of discontinuing SSRI/SNRIs prior to study enrolment on study outcomes.

methodsExploratory post hoc analyses using linear mixed effects model were performed to investigate the discontinuation effect on various validated depression symptom severity scales and well-being. The impact of SSRI/SNRIs discontinuation on the acute psychedelic experience was also explored. RESULTS/OUTCOMES: In the psilocybin group, there was a reduced treatment effect on all outcome measures for SSRI/SNRIs discontinuers compared with unmedicated patients at trial entry. However, no effects of discontinuation on measures of the acute psychedelic experience were found.

conclusionDiscontinuation of SSRI/SNRIs before psilocybin might diminish response to treatment; however, as we did not test SSRI/SNRI continuation in our trial, we cannot infer such causation. Moreover, the exploratory nature of the analyses makes them hypothesis generating, and not confirmatory. A controlled trial of SSRI/SNRI discontinuation versus continuation prior to psilocybin is urgently required.

Indexed as

EscitalopramHallucinogensMajor Depressive DisorderPsilocybinSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAdultDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeEscitalopramHallucinogensPsilocybinSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsDepressionescitaloprampsilocyibinpsychiatrySSRI

Identifiers

PMID38520045
PMCPMC11102650
OpenAlexW4393118291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.