Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38520014›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2024

A numerical compass for experiment design in chemical kinetics and molecular property estimation.

Matteo Krüger, Ashmi Mishra, Peter Spichtinger, Ulrich Pöschl, Thomas Berkemeier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Carbon Nanoparticle Oxidation by NOAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matteo KrügerMultiphase Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Hahn-Meitner-Weg 1, Mainz, 55128, Rhineland Palatinate, Germany.
Ashmi MishraMultiphase Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Hahn-Meitner-Weg 1, Mainz, 55128, Rhineland Palatinate, Germany.
Peter SpichtingerInstitute for Atmospheric Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University, Johann-Joachim-Becher-Weg 21, Mainz, 55128, Rhineland Palatinate, Germany.
Ulrich PöschlMultiphase Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Hahn-Meitner-Weg 1, Mainz, 55128, Rhineland Palatinate, Germany.
Thomas BerkemeierMultiphase Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Hahn-Meitner-Weg 1, Mainz, 55128, Rhineland Palatinate, Germany. t.berkemeier@mpic.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kinetic process models are widely applied in science and engineering, including atmospheric, physiological and technical chemistry, reactor design, or process optimization. These models rely on numerous kinetic parameters such as reaction rate, diffusion or partitioning coefficients. Determining these properties by experiments can be challenging, especially for multiphase systems, and researchers often face the task of intuitively selecting experimental conditions to obtain insightful results. We developed a numerical compass (NC) method that integrates computational models, global optimization, ensemble methods, and machine learning to identify experimental conditions with the greatest potential to constrain model parameters. The approach is based on the quantification of model output variance in an ensemble of solutions that agree with experimental data. The utility of the NC method is demonstrated for the parameters of a multi-layer model describing the heterogeneous ozonolysis of oleic acid aerosols. We show how neural network surrogate models of the multiphase chemical reaction system can be used to accelerate the application of the NC for a comprehensive mapping and analysis of experimental conditions. The NC can also be applied for uncertainty quantification of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models. We show that the uncertainty calculated for molecules that are used to extend training data correlates with the reduction of QSAR model error. The code is openly available as the Julia package KineticCompass.

Indexed as

Chemical kineticsDesign of experiments (DOE)Ensemble methodsGlobal optimizationInverse problemMachine learningMultiphase chemistryQSAR

Identifiers

PMID38520014
PMCPMC10960421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.