Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38520007›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2024

Synchronous timing of return to breeding sites in a long-distance migratory seabird with ocean-scale variation in migration schedules.

Rob S A van Bemmelen, Børge Moe, Hans Schekkerman, Sveinn Are Hansen, Katherine R S Snell, Elizabeth M Humphreys, Elina Mäntylä, Gunnar Thor Hallgrimsson, Olivier Gilg, Dorothée Ehrich and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Rob S A van BemmelenWageningen Marine Research, Haringkade 1, 1976 CP, IJmuiden, The Netherlands. rvanbemmelen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0688-7058
Børge MoeNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Trondheim, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2306-1899
Hans SchekkermanSOVON Vogelonderzoek Nederland, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3127-4832
Sveinn Are HansenNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Tromsø, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1792-435X
Katherine R S SnellCenter for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3720-4579
Elizabeth M HumphreysBritish Trust for Ornithology (BTO), Scotland, Stirling University Innovation Park, Stirling, FK9 4NF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2570-400X
Elina MäntyläSection of Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2267-7114
Gunnar Thor HallgrimssonDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3697-9148
Olivier GilgUMR 6249 Chrono-Environnement, CNRS, Université de Bourgogne Franche Comté, 25000, Besançon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9083-4492
Dorothée EhrichUiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3028-9488
John CalladineBritish Trust for Ornithology (BTO), Scotland, Stirling University Innovation Park, Stirling, FK9 4NF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0494-1540
Sjúrður HammerFaculty of Science and Technology, University of the Faroe Islands, Vestarabryggja 15, 100, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3986-5074
Sarah HarrisBritish Trust for Ornithology (BTO), The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk, IP24 2PU, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7732-9758
Johannes LangGroupe de Recherche en Ecologie Arctique, 16 Rue de Vernot, 21440, Francheville, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7387-795X
Sölvi Rúnar VignissonSudurnes Science and Learning Center, Suðurnesjabær, Iceland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1026-5267
Yann KolbeinssonNortheast Iceland Nature Research Centre, Husavik, Iceland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6216-1940
Kimmo NuotioPori Ornithological Society, Pori, Finland.
Matti SillanpääPori Ornithological Society, Pori, Finland.
Benoît SittlerGroupe de Recherche en Ecologie Arctique, 16 Rue de Vernot, 21440, Francheville, France.
Aleksandr SokolovArctic Research Station of Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Labytnangi, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1521-3856
Raymond H G KlaassenConservation Ecology Group, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), Groningen University, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9840-506X
Richard A PhillipsBritish Antarctic Survey (BAS), Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0208-1444
Ingrid TulpWageningen Marine Research, Haringkade 1, 1976 CP, IJmuiden, The Netherlands. ingrid.tulp@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6002-1741

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ILETOP ANR-16-CE34-0005ERC 669609Fram Center 2019147470 1152018Fram Center Yamal EcoSystem 362259French Polar Institute-IPEV Interactions-1036Kone Foundation 28-1235Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 866.13.005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigratory birds generally have tightly scheduled annual cycles, in which delays can have carry-over effects on the timing of later events, ultimately impacting reproductive output. Whether temporal carry-over effects are more pronounced among migrations over larger distances, with tighter schedules, is a largely unexplored question.

methodsWe tracked individual Arctic Skuas Stercorarius parasiticus, a long-distance migratory seabird, from eight breeding populations between Greenland and Siberia using light-level geolocators. We tested whether migration schedules among breeding populations differ as a function of their use of seven widely divergent wintering areas across the Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean Sea and Indian Ocean.

resultsBreeding at higher latitudes led not only to later reproduction and migration, but also faster spring migration and shorter time between return to the breeding area and clutch initiation. Wintering area was consistent within individuals among years; and more distant areas were associated with more time spent on migration and less time in the wintering areas. Skuas adjusted the period spent in the wintering area, regardless of migration distance, which buffered the variation in timing of autumn migration. Choice of wintering area had only minor effects on timing of return at the breeding area and timing of breeding and these effects were not consistent between breeding populations.

conclusionThe lack of a consistent effect of wintering area on timing of return between breeding areas indicates that individuals synchronize their arrival with others in their population despite extensive individual differences in migration strategies.

Indexed as

Annual cycleArctic SkuaCarry-over effectsMigratory connectivityParasitic JaegerPhenologyStercorarius parasiticus

Identifiers

PMID38520007
PMCPMC10960466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.