ArticleBMC cancer2024
Development and validation of a Radiopathomics model based on CT scans and whole slide images for discriminating between Stage I-II and Stage III gastric cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Prediction Model for Progression Risk in High-Grade Gliomas Based on Habitat Radiomics and Pathomics.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Multimodal deep learning for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma staging using CT and laryngoscopy.European radiology · 2026Article
- A multimodal study on predicting extrathyroidal extension of papillary thyroid carcinoma based on radiopathomics.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Article
- Review
- Beyond Biomarkers: Machine Learning-Driven Multiomics for Personalized Medicine in Gastric Cancer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- An interpretable framework for gastric cancer classification using multi-channel attention mechanisms and transfer learning approach on histopathology images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- CCL26 as a prognostic biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma: integrating bioinformatics analysis, clinical validation, and radiomics score.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- The artificial intelligence revolution in gastric cancer management: clinical applications.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal cancers: Diagnostic, prognostic, and surgical strategies.Cancer letters · 2025Review
- Deep learning and radiomics for gastric cancer serosal invasion: automated segmentation and multi-machine learning from two centers.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Construction of an oligometastatic prediction model for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients based on pathomics features and dynamic multi-swarm particle swarm optimization support vector machine.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- The data scientist as a mainstay of the tumor board: global implications and opportunities for the global south.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence radiopathological model using preoperative CT scans and postoperative hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stained slides to predict the pathological staging of gastric cancer (stage I-II and stage III).
methodsThis study included a total of 202 gastric cancer patients with confirmed pathological staging (training cohort: n = 141; validation cohort: n = 61). Pathological histological features were extracted from HE slides, and pathological models were constructed using logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and NaiveBayes. The optimal pathological model was selected through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Machine learnin algorithms were employed to construct radiomic models and radiopathological models using the optimal pathological model. Model performance was evaluated using ROC curve analysis, and clinical utility was estimated using decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsA total of 311 pathological histological features were extracted from the HE images, including 101 Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) features and 210 deep learning features. A pathological model was constructed using 19 selected pathological features through dimension reduction, with the SVM model demonstrating superior predictive performance (AUC, training cohort: 0.949; validation cohort: 0.777). Radiomic features were constructed using 6 selected features from 1834 radiomic features extracted from CT scans via SVM machine algorithm. Simultaneously, a radiopathomics model was built using 17 non-zero coefficient features obtained through dimension reduction from a total of 2145 features (combining both radiomics and pathomics features). The best discriminative ability was observed in the SVM_radiopathomics model (AUC, training cohort: 0.953; validation cohort: 0.851), and clinical decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated excellent clinical utility.
conclusionThe radiopathomics model, combining pathological and radiomic features, exhibited superior performance in distinguishing between stage I-II and stage III gastric cancer. This study is based on the prediction of pathological staging using pathological tissue slides from surgical specimens after gastric cancer curative surgery and preoperative CT images, highlighting the feasibility of conducting research on pathological staging using pathological slides and CT images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.