Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38519949›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

How external and agency characteristics are related to coordination in homecare - findings of the national multicenter, cross-sectional SPOT

Nathalie Möckli, Michael Simon, Kris Denhaerynck, Diana Trutschel, Tania Martins, Carla Meyer-Massetti, Franziska Zúñiga

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathalie MöckliDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Michael SimonDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Kris DenhaerynckDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Diana TrutschelDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Tania MartinsDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Carla Meyer-MassettiClinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital - University Hospital Bern, CH-3010, Freiburgstrasse, Bern, Switzerland.
Franziska ZúñigaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland. franziska.zuniga@unibas.ch.
Bern University of Applied Sciences · CHUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHomecare client services are often distributed across several interdependent healthcare providers, making proper care coordination essential. However, as studies exploring care coordination in the homecare setting are scarce, serious knowledge gaps exist regarding how various factors influence coordination in this care sector. To fill such gaps, this study's central aim was to explore how external factors (i.e., financial and regulatory mechanisms) and homecare agency characteristics (i.e., work environment, workforce, and client characteristics) are related to care coordination in homecare.

methodsThis analysis was part of a national multicentre, cross-sectional study in the Swiss homecare setting that included a stratified random sample of 88 Swiss homecare agencies. Data were collected between January and September 2021 through agency and employee questionnaires. Using our newly developed care coordination framework, COORA, we modelled our variables to assess the relevant components of care coordination on the structural, process, and outcome levels. We conducted both descriptive and multilevel regression analyses-with the latter adjusting for dependencies within agencies-to explore which key factors are associated with coordination.

resultsThe final sample size consisted of 1450 employees of 71 homecare agencies. We found that one explicit coordination mechanism ("communication and information exchange" (beta = 0.10, p <.001)) and four implicit coordination mechanisms-"knowledge of the health system" (beta = -0.07, p <.01), "role clarity" (beta = 0.07, p <.001), "mutual respect and trust" (beta = 0.07, p <.001), and "accountability, predictability, common perspective" (beta = 0.19, p <.001)-were significantly positively associated with employee-perceived coordination. We also found that the effects of agency characteristics and external factors were mediated through coordination processes.

conclusionImplicit coordination mechanisms, which enable and enhance team communication, require closer examination. While developing strategies to strengthen implicit mechanisms, the involvement of the entire care team is vital to create structures (i.e., explicit mechanisms) that enable communication and information exchange. Appropriate coordination processes seem to mitigate the association between staffing and coordination. This suggests that they support coordination even when workload and overtime are higher.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPalliative CareSurveys and Questionnaires“Communication”[Mesh]Coordination“Delivery of health care”[Mesh]“Government regulation”[Mesh]“Healthcare financing”[Mesh]“Health services Research”[Mesh]“Home care services”[Mesh]“Nursing administration research”[Mesh]“Quality of health care”[Mesh]

Identifiers

PMID38519949
PMCPMC10960419
OpenAlexW4393064726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.