Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38519906›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024

Improving somatic exome sequencing performance by biological replicates.

Yunus Emre Cebeci, Rumeysa Aslihan Erturk, Mehmet Arif Ergun, Mehmet Baysan

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yunus Emre CebeciDepartment of Computer Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, 34469, Istanbul, Turkey.
Rumeysa Aslihan ErturkDepartment of Computer Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, 34469, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet Arif ErgunDepartment of Computer Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, 34469, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet BaysanDepartment of Computer Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, 34469, Istanbul, Turkey. baysanm@itu.edu.tr.
Istanbul Technical University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNext-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies offer fast and inexpensive identification of DNA sequences. Somatic sequencing is among the primary applications of NGS, where acquired (non-inherited) variants are based on comparing diseased and healthy tissues from the same individual. Somatic mutations in genetic diseases such as cancer are tightly associated with genomic instability. Genomic instability increases heterogenity, complicating sequencing efforts further, a task already challenged by the presence of short reads and repetitions in human DNA. This leads to low concordance among studies and limits reproducibility. This limitation is a significant problem since identified mutations in somatic sequencing are major biomarkers for diagnosis and the primary input of targeted therapies. Benchmarking studies were conducted to assess the error rates and increase reproducibility. Unfortunately, the number of somatic benchmarking sets is very limited due to difficulties in validating true somatic variants. Moreover, most NGS benchmarking studies are based on relatively simpler germline (inherited) sequencing. Recently, a comprehensive somatic sequencing benchmarking set was published by Sequencing Quality Control Phase 2 (SEQC2). We chose this dataset for our experiments because it is a well-validated, cancer-focused dataset that includes many tumor/normal biological replicates. Our study has two primary goals. First goal is to determine how replicate-based consensus approaches can improve the accuracy of somatic variant detection systems. Second goal is to develop highly predictive machine learning (ML) models by employing replicate-based consensus variants as labels during the training phase.

resultsEnsemble approaches that combine alternative algorithms are relatively common; here, as an alternative, we study the performance enhancement potential of biological replicates. We first developed replicate-based consensus approaches that utilize the biological replicates available in this study to improve variant calling performance. Subsequently, we trained ML models using these biological replicates and achieved performance comparable to optimal ML models, those trained using high-confidence variants identified in advance.

conclusionsOur replicate-based consensus approach can be used to improve variant calling performance and develop efficient ML models. Given the relative ease of obtaining biological replicates, this strategy allows for the development of efficient ML models tailored to specific datasets or scenarios.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeoplasmsExome SequencingGenomic InstabilityHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansReproducibility of ResultsCancer genomicsMachine learningNeuSomatic ensembleNext generation sequencingPrecision medicineReplicate-based consensusSEQC2Single nucleotide variantSomatic sequencingWhole exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID38519906
PMCPMC10958848
OpenAlexW4393074477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.